General characteristics of optimal feed rate profiles for various fed−batch fermentation processes
Abstract
General Characteristics of the optimal feed rate profiles have been deduced for various fed-batch fermentation processes by analyzing singular controls and singular arcs. The optimal control sequences depend on the shapes of the specific growth and product formation rates, mu andpi, and the initial conditions. For fed-batch processes described by four mass balance equations, the most general optimal control sequence consists of a period of maximum feed rate, a period of minimum feed rate (a batch period), a period of singular feed rate (variable and intermediate), and a batch period. Degenerate sequences in which one or more periods are missing can result with a particular set of initial conditions. If the fermentation time is not critical, the singular control maximizes the net yield of product and only when the time is also important, it balances a trade off between the yield of product and the specific growth rate which dictates the fermentation time. With the sequence of optimal control known, the optimal feed rate profile determination is reduced to a problem of determining switching times.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers would expect a higher yield of end-products from fed-batch fermentation because it entails a scale-up process.
“Given that the fed-batch fermentation system entails a scale-up process, researchers would expect a higher yield of end-products (Modak et al., 1986; Thiry and Cingolani, 2002; Hewitt and Nienow, 2007).”
From Fermentation Conditions that Affect Clavulanic Acid Production in Streptomyces clavuligerus: A Systematic Review (2016) · cites this paper as Modak et al., 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ser, H.-L., Law, J. W.-F., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Jacob, S. A., Palanisamy, U. D., Chan, K.-G., Goh, B.-H., & Lee, L.-H. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00522 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“Given that the fed-batch fermentation system entails a scale-up process, researchers would expect a higher yield of end-products (Modak et al., 1986; Thiry and Cingolani, 2002; Hewitt and Nienow, 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- Modak, J. M., Lim, H. C., & Tayeb, Y. J.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, H. C.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1396-1407
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2132510800
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- fed-batch fermentation, singular control, singular arcs, optimal control sequence, switching time, specific growth rate, product formation rate, product yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review