The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anaerobic acidogenesis of a complex wastewater: I. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance
Abstract
The influence of operational, parameters, such as hydraulic retention time, organic loading rate, influent substrate concentration, pH, and temperature, on the performance of the first phase of anaerobic digestion has been investigated. A complex substrate based on beef extract was used, and six series of experimental runs were conducted, each one showing the effect of one operational variable. The predominant fermentation products were always acetic and propionic acid, independent of the values of the operational parameters. For initial COD concentrations and hydraulic retention times above the critical values identified as 3 g/L and 6 h, respectively, the degree of acidification achieved was between 30 and 60%. The degree of acidification was found to increase with the hydraulic retention time and decrease with the influent substrate concentration and organic loading rate, while the opposite held true for the rate of product formation. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that acidification is primarily determined by the hydraulic retention time and the rate of product formation by the influent substrate concentration. The concentration of the acetic acid produced was found to depend on the operational parameters. However, the concentration of propionic acid produced depended only on the substrate availability with a consistent proportion of 8% initial COD converted to it. The optimum pH and temperature were 7 and 40°C, respectively. The percentage of acetic acid as a proportion of the total volatile fatty acids produced was found to increase with increasing pH and temperature, while the percentage of propionic acid seemed to decrease accordingly. Finally the effect of the temperature on the rate of acidification followed an Arrhenius type equation with an activation energy equal to 4739 cal/mol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion
Meegoda, J. N., Li, B., Patel, K., & Wang, L. B. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15102224 · Cited by 721
State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment
Rajeshwari, K. V., Balakrishnan, M., Kansal, A., Lata, K., & Kishore, V. V. N. (2000) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1364-0321(99)00014-3 · Cited by 616
Biohydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of food waste
Han, S. (2004) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.001 · Cited by 521
Bharathiraja, B., Sudharsana, T., Jayamuthunagai, J., Praveenkumar, R., Chozhavendhan, S., & Iyyappan, J. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093 · Cited by 321
RetractedSteinbusch, K. J. J., Hamelers, H. V. M., & Buisman, C. J. N. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.032 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinopoulou, G., Rudd, T., & Lester, J. N.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-06-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 958-968
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2106177085
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic acidogenesis of a complex wastewater: I. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.260310908
- The paper
- Dinopoulou, G., Rudd, T., & Lester, J. N. (1988). Anaerobic acidogenesis of a complex wastewater: I. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260310908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.