The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion
Open accessAbstract
Anaerobic digestion is a technology that has been used by humans for centuries. Anaerobic digestion is considered to be a useful tool that can generate renewable energy and significant research interest has arisen recently. The underlying theory of anaerobic digestion has been established for decades; however, a great deal of current research is directed towards the optimization of anaerobic digestion under diverse digestion conditions. This review provides a summary of the processes underlying anaerobic digestion, commonly-utilized measurements of anaerobic sludge, operating parameters of anaerobic digesters, and methods of acceleration and optimization used to improve process efficiency. Recent developments in addition to older research are considered to provide a general but comprehensive summary of accumulated knowledge in the theory of anaerobic digestion, as well as considerations in the efficient operation of digesters. We have determined that the numerous factors pertinent to the design and operation of batch-based anaerobic digesters must each be considered to ensure the maximum efficiency and cost-effectiveness of a digester provided its respective operating conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion
Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, G. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 · Cited by 1,766
Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea
Stams, A. J. M., & Plugge, C. M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2166 · Cited by 1,441
Cited by
Anukam, A., Mohammadi, A., Naqvi, M., & Granström, K. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7080504 · Cited by 452
A Review of Sludge-to-Energy Recovery Methods
Oladejo, J., Shi, K., Luo, X., Yang, G., & Wu, T. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12010060 · Cited by 322
Czatzkowska, M., Harnisz, M., Korzeniewska, E., & Koniuszewska, I. (2020) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.609 · Cited by 149
Valorization of fruit and vegetable waste for biofertilizer and biogas
Chakravarty, I., & Mandavgane, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Food Process Engineering · doi:10.1111/jfpe.13512 · Cited by 41
Aili Hamzah, A. F., Hamzah, M. H., Mazlan, N. I., Che Man, H., Jamali, N. S., Siajam, S. I., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.042 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Meegoda, J. N., Li, B., Patel, K., & Wang, L. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-10-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2224
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897574871
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph15102224
- The paper
- Meegoda, J. N., Li, B., Patel, K., & Wang, L. B. (2018). A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.