Cited by 25Biofuel production and bioconversionSugarcane Cultivation and ProcessingCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Impact of protein blocking on enzymatic saccharification of bagasse from sugarcane clones

Open access
Ázar, Rafaela I. S. Ladeira, Morgan, Túlio, Barbosa, Márcio H. P., Guimarães, Valéria M., Ximenes, Eduardo, Ladisch, Michael·2019·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Lignin plays an important functional and structural role in plants, but also contributes to the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrolysis. This study addresses the influence of lignin in hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse from conventional bred lines (UFV260 and UFV204) that were selected from 432 field‐grown clones. In addition to higher sugar production, bagasse clone UFV204 had a small, but statistically significant, lower insoluble lignin content compared with clone UFV260 (15.5% vs, 16.6%) and also exhibited a significantly higher cellulose conversion to glucose (81.3% vs. 63.3%) at a cellulase loading of 5 (filter paper unit) FPU/g of glucan or 3 FPU/g total solids for liquid hot water pretreated bagasse (200°C, 10 min). The enzyme loading was further decreased by 50% to 2.5 FPU/g glucan and resulted in a similar glucan conversion (88.5%) for clone UFV204 when the bagasse was preincubated with bovine serum albumin at pH 4.8 and nonproductive binding of cellulase components was blocked. Comparison of Langmuir adsorption isotherms and differential adsorption of the three major cellulolytic enzyme components endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β‐glucosidase help to explain differences due to lignin content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.26962

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ázar, R. I. S. L., Morgan, T., Barbosa, M. H. P., Guimarães, V. M., Ximenes, E., & Ladisch, M.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Renewable Resources Engineering, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Ladisch, Michael
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
1584-1593
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2917839316
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education (DE‐EE0008256)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
sugarcane bagasse, lignin, enzymatic saccharification, bovine serum albumin, cellulase adsorption, endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, β-glucosidase, sugarcane clones, cellulose conversion, Langmuir isotherm, hot water pretreatment
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Hydrolysis, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Saccharum, Cellulose 1,4-beta-Cellobiosidase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review