Good design practices for an integrated containment and production system for advanced therapies
Abstract
Advances in molecular biology and the possibility of differentiating stem cells have opened up new scenarios in therapies that use progenitor or variously differentiated cells. Regardless of the choice of the system, designing a plant for producing advanced therapies requires a clear understanding of the final objective (the product), taking into account all the regulatory, environment, process, risk assessment, asepsis, and validation aspects involved until its implementation. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliant procedures are a prerequisite for cell production in clinical application, and clean rooms are zones for producing cell therapies. Clean rooms for clinical application require high running and maintenance costs and need trained operators and strict procedures to prepare the rooms and the people involved in the processes. While today production mainly occurs in open systems (clean rooms), there is evidence of processes in closed systems (isolators). The isolator is a Grade A aseptic closed system that requires a controlled environment and at least a Grade D environment in the case of sterile productions (A in D closed system). The use of isolators can ensure a very high level of protection against the risk of product contamination and, at the same time, provide the operators with a very safe working environment. Furthermore, working with closed systems can optimize and facilitate the production of Advanced Therapy Medical Products in GMP environments, by provi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards.
“Consequently, isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards (Zanini et al., 2020).”
From Isolator-based point-of-care manufacturing: a practical solution for GMP-compliant cell and extracellular vesicles therapy production (2025) · cites this paper as Zanini et al., 2020
Isolators operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety, reduce facility operational complexity and cost, and enable reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.
“Isolators, operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds, provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety. They also reduce facility operational complexity and cost, enabling reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.”
From Isolator-based point-of-care manufacturing: a practical solution for GMP-compliant cell and extracellular vesicles therapy production (2025) · cites this paper as Zanini et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiu, Y.-S., Wang, K.-L., & Wu, K.-L. (2025) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644318 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zanini, C., Severina, F., Lando, G., Fanizza, C., Cesana, E., Desidera, D., & Bonifacio, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Turin (IT)
- Advanced Therapies Department BioAir SPA Pero Italy
- Corresponding author
- Zanini, Cristina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-05-29
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2319-2330
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W3023939302
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
- Keywords
- isolators, closed systems, cleanrooms, good manufacturing practices, aseptic processing, risk assessment, process validation, cost reduction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Therapy, Biotechnology, Drug Contamination, Environment, Controlled, Humans, Quality Control, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review