Cited by 11Biomedical Ethics and RegulationViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs

Good design practices for an integrated containment and production system for advanced therapies

Zanini, Cristina, Severina, Franco, Lando, Giovanni, Fanizza, Carlotta, Cesana, Eugenio, Desidera, Davide, Bonifacio, Marco·2020·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Advances in molecular biology and the possibility of differentiating stem cells have opened up new scenarios in therapies that use progenitor or variously differentiated cells. Regardless of the choice of the system, designing a plant for producing advanced therapies requires a clear understanding of the final objective (the product), taking into account all the regulatory, environment, process, risk assessment, asepsis, and validation aspects involved until its implementation. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliant procedures are a prerequisite for cell production in clinical application, and clean rooms are zones for producing cell therapies. Clean rooms for clinical application require high running and maintenance costs and need trained operators and strict procedures to prepare the rooms and the people involved in the processes. While today production mainly occurs in open systems (clean rooms), there is evidence of processes in closed systems (isolators). The isolator is a Grade A aseptic closed system that requires a controlled environment and at least a Grade D environment in the case of sterile productions (A in D closed system). The use of isolators can ensure a very high level of protection against the risk of product contamination and, at the same time, provide the operators with a very safe working environment. Furthermore, working with closed systems can optimize and facilitate the production of Advanced Therapy Medical Products in GMP environments, by provi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.27376

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards.

    “Consequently, isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards (Zanini et al., 2020).”
  • Isolators operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety, reduce facility operational complexity and cost, and enable reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.

    “Isolators, operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds, provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety. They also reduce facility operational complexity and cost, enabling reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zanini, C., Severina, F., Lando, G., Fanizza, C., Cesana, E., Desidera, D., & Bonifacio, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Advanced Therapies Department BioAir SPA Pero Italy
Corresponding author
Zanini, Cristina
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
117
Issue
8
Pages
2319-2330
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W3023939302
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Keywords
isolators, closed systems, cleanrooms, good manufacturing practices, aseptic processing, risk assessment, process validation, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Therapy, Biotechnology, Drug Contamination, Environment, Controlled, Humans, Quality Control, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review