Isolator-based point-of-care manufacturing: a practical solution for GMP-compliant cell and extracellular vesicles therapy production
Open accessAbstract
Cell and extracellular vesicle (EV)-based therapies represent a promising frontier in regenerative medicine and immunotherapy. However, their clinical translation is often constrained by the complexities of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant production, particularly under centralized manufacturing models. This Perspective discusses the emerging role of decentralized, point-of-care (POC) manufacturing in enabling timely, scalable, and patient-specific delivery of cell and EV therapeutics, with a focus on isolator-based systems as core manufacturing infrastructure. We discuss current advances in closed-system technologies, regulatory frameworks, and quality control (QC) strategies supporting GMP compliance in decentralized environments. Real-world applications and case studies illustrate feasibility and translational impact. Isolator-based platforms offer modular, sterile, automation-compatible environments that support both autologous and selected allogeneic product manufacturing at clinical sites. These systems reduce contamination risks, lower facility requirements, and enable integration with real-time QC testing. Despite these advantages, challenges remain, including regulatory ambiguity, workforce training limitations, and quality assurance gaps in decentralized settings. Emerging solutions include automated closed-system bioreactors, digitalized QC workflows, and harmonized operational standards to ensure product safety and consistency. Strategic coordination among regulators, hospitals, and developers will be essential to overcome operational and compliance hurdles. With appropriate infrastructure, skilled personnel, and standardized processes in place, isolator-based POC manufacturing holds the potential to transform how advanced therapies are produced and delivered—ultimately enhancing patient access to safe, effective, and personalized cell and EV-based treatments.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This Perspective argues that isolator-based, closed-system point-of-care (POC) manufacturing can make GMP-compliant production of cell and extracellular vesicle (EV) therapies feasible within hospitals, reducing contamination risk, facility requirements, and vein-to-vein time. It surveys the enabling technology, QC/regulatory frameworks, and remaining barriers (regulatory ambiguity, workforce training, QA gaps, cost) without presenting new primary data.
Key findings
- Isolators are fully sealed systems that can operate in lower-grade backgrounds (Grade D, ISO 8, ~20 ACH) than BSCs or RABS, which require Grade B cleanrooms (ISO 5 at rest, ISO 7 in operation, ≥240–300 ACH), while providing automated, quantifiable decontamination and validated leak control (Table 1).
- Rapid QC can shorten release timelines: automated fluorescence-based microbial detection (e.g., BacT/Alert) gives sterility results in 3–5 days versus the compendial 14 days, solid-phase cytometry (e.g., ScanRDI) in under 3 h, and qPCR mycoplasma testing in 1–4 h.
- POC manufacturing is best suited to autologous, non-genetically modified, short-shelf-life products (e.g., chondrocytes, BMSCs, ADSCs, CIK cells, DCs), while centralized manufacturing remains dominant for allogeneic off-the-shelf products; isolators can nonetheless support gene-modified therapies by containing transduction and expansion steps.
- Cited examples of feasibility include isolator-based IVF improving blastocyst development and pregnancy/implantation rates, the authors' own GMP isolator-produced WJ-MSC exosomes showing neuroprotection in a rodent stroke model, and the "Tissue Factory" producing myoblast sheets, chondrocytes, and iPSCs without microbial contamination.
Methods
Not stated in the paper (this is a Perspective article, not a primary study). The text synthesizes published literature, regulatory guidance (PIC/S, ISO, USP, ISEV MISEV2018), and illustrative case studies to argue for isolator-based decentralized manufacturing; no systematic search strategy, dataset, or quantitative analysis is described. QC parameters discussed include immunophenotyping panels (e.g., CD3/CD56 for CIK, CD56+CD3− for NK, CD105/CD73/CD90 for MSCs per ISCT criteria), potency assays (chromium-51 release, flow-based killing, luminescence), and EV characterization (30–150 nm size, tetraspanins CD63/CD81/CD9, cargo analysis).
Limitations
The paper itself states that regulatory classification of cell therapies (procedure vs. ATMP) remains ambiguous, that workforce availability and technical expertise are limited especially at smaller centers, that decentralized sites may lack full GMP QA systems, and that isolator capital costs, spatial requirements, and maintenance constrain scalability; automation and robotic platforms remain costly and not widely adopted. Evident from the text: as a Perspective it presents no primary data, no systematic review methodology, and no quantitative comparison of POC versus centralized outcomes; several supporting examples are drawn from the authors' own prior work and from non-cell-therapy contexts (IVF).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
28 of 55 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Automated isolator-based platforms represent a paradigm shift towards scalable, cost-effective, and standardized production of cell-based healthcare products.
“Such automated isolator-based platforms represent a paradigm shift towards scalable, cost-effective, and standardized production of cell-based healthcare products (Kikuchi et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kikuchi et al., 2018 source
The Conclusion and Discussion (‘Modularity, flexibility and cost-effectiveness’; page not provided) describe a novel automated isolator-based platform expected to lower costs, improve quality consistency, and support multiple batches. But these are largely projected benefits, and parallel production is conditional on resolving regulatory issues; the paper does not establish scalable, cost-effective, standardized production as an achieved paradigm shift. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In some jurisdictions, the hospital exemption pathway allows non-commercial use of ATMPs within the same institution under defined conditions, facilitating certain POC manufacturing models.
“In some jurisdictions, the “hospital exemption” pathway allows for non-commercial use of ATMPs within the same institution under defined conditions, facilitating certain POC manufacturing models (Sánchez-Guijo et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sánchez-Guijo et al., 2023 source
The Hospital Exemption section (page unavailable) describes non-routine ATMP manufacture outside the standard marketing-authorization pathway, subject to quality standards, national authorization, and use in a hospital within the same Member State. It also describes academic manufacturing, but does not require manufacture and use within the same institution or explicitly link the exemption to point-of-care manufacturing models. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Gene-modified therapies, including iPSC-derived products and CAR-T cells, present distinct biosafety and technical challenges for POC implementation.
“Gene-modified therapies, including iPSC-derived products and CAR-T cells, present distinct biosafety and technical challenges for POC implementation (Nakagawa et al., 2014; Moradi et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Nakagawa et al., 2014 source
The Discussion says hiPSC clinical use requires attention to quality, safety, GMP manufacturing, and animal-derived materials; the Abstract also describes technical problems with conventional culture. Our copy does not address CAR-T cells or challenges specific to point-of-care (POC) implementation. Its CPC refers to a Cell Processing Center, not point-of-care delivery. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Moradi et al., 2023 source
- Premisecitation
Integrating robotic arms within isolator systems represents a promising hybrid approach, enabling high-throughput, GMP-compliant cell manufacturing in compact, modular setups.
“Integrating robotic arms within isolator systems represents a promising hybrid approach, enabling high-throughput, GMP-compliant cell manufacturing in compact, modular setups (Melocchi et al., 2024; Ochs et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Melocchi et al., 2024 source
The Robotic Cluster Design section describes a robotic arm surrounded by task-specific modules, and the Discussion says the system could support parallel processing and scale-up in a small footprint. But the paper does not describe integrating the arm within an isolator or establish GMP compliance; the Sterility of Robotic Processing section reports a proof-of-concept test in a standard, non-cleanroom laboratory. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ochs et al., 2022 source
The Results (AUTOSTEM platform overview and Sterility; page not provided) describe robot arms in a grade A isolator, and the Discussion describes 24/7 production and GMP-oriented design. The Introduction discusses modular processing components, but the copy does not establish that this particular setup is compact or demonstrate high-throughput, GMP-compliant manufacture; it calls the platform GMP-amenable and says cleaning validation will be performed. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Automated fluorescence-based microbial detection systems such as BacT/Alert detect metabolic activity or CO2 production of microorganisms in culture bottles, providing results within 3-5 days rather than 14 days.
“For example, automated fluorescence-based microbial detection systems, such as BacT/Alert, detect metabolic activity or CO2 production of microorganisms in culture bottles, providing results within 3–5 days rather than 14 days (Lim et al., 2014; Bugno et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Lim et al., 2014 source
- cites Bugno et al., 2015 source
The Introduction describes BacT/ALERT 3D as an automated system that detects microbial growth through biochemical or physiological changes, including CO2 production measured colorimetrically—not by fluorescence. The Results and Discussion report faster detection than conventional testing, but do not establish a 3–5-day result time; the Incubation conditions section says both methods were incubated for 14 days. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Isolator-based systems can facilitate production of clinically applicable EVs with consistent quality and safety.
“The resulting exosomes exhibited significant neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo, underscoring how isolator-based systems can facilitate the production of clinically applicable EVs with consistent quality and safety (Chiu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiu et al., 2024 source
The Materials and Methods (Exosome Purification; page unavailable) describe filtration and spin-column purification, not an isolator-based production system. The Discussion (page unavailable) says clinical safety and regulatory issues still require evaluation; our copy does not address whether isolator-based systems yield EVs of consistent quality and safety. Searched for isolator systems, clinical-grade production, and quality control. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Transportation variables including extended transit time, temperature fluctuations, and improper thawing can compromise viability or biological activity of living cells and EV-based products.
“Variables associated with transportation, including extended transit time, temperature fluctuations, and improper thawing procedures, can compromise the viability or biological activity of living cells and EV-based products (Lee and Chang, 2024; Gupta and Shaz, 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Lee and Chang, 2024 source
The MSC-based cell therapies section lists freezing, storage, and shipment as steps in distributing cells, but does not say that transit time, temperature fluctuations, or improper thawing compromise viability. The AAV and LV-based gene therapies section discusses environmental effects on lentiviral-vector functionality during production, not transportation of living cells or EV-based products. Searches for the specified transportation and thawing effects found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Gupta and Shaz, 2025 source
The Introduction discusses delays and logistics in transporting CAR T-cells, but says the consequence is delayed treatment for patients, not reduced cell viability or activity. The Results describe freezing methods, while the Discussion addresses manufacturing variability; neither links transit time, temperature fluctuations, or thawing to product damage, and no passage addresses EV-based products. Searched those transportation and handling terms in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
EAPs can enable broader access to investigational products across institutions prior to formal market approval.
“EAPs can enable broader access to investigational products across institutions prior to formal market approval (Klopfenstein et al., 2015; Jarow et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Klopfenstein et al., 2015 source
- cites Jarow et al., 2017 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says a widespread-treatment expanded access application can provide investigational drugs to a large population and bridge the period before marketing approval. The paper does not specify access across institutions, so that part of the claim is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mycoplasma pose a persistent threat to cell culture systems due to their intracellular parasitic nature, lack of a cell wall, and resistance to standard antibiotics.
“Mycoplasma are among the smallest prokaryotic organisms and pose a persistent threat to cell culture systems due to their intracellular parasitic nature, lack of a cell wall, and resistance to standard antibiotics (Totten et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Totten et al., 2023 source
The Abstract (page unavailable) describes Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures as common and an ongoing safety concern, supporting the claim that it poses a persistent threat. The passages do not attribute that threat to intracellular parasitism, lack of a cell wall, or resistance to standard antibiotics; they also do not establish the citing sentence’s description of Mycoplasma as among the smallest prokaryotes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Successful clinical translation of cell and EV therapies critically depends on robust, scalable, GMP-compliant manufacturing systems.
“However, the successful clinical translation of these products critically depends on robust, scalable, and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant manufacturing systems (Patel et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Patel et al., 2025 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Isolator-based POC manufacturing directly supports both HE and EAP frameworks by enabling decentralized, small-scale production of ATMPs or EV therapies under GMP-compliant conditions within hospital settings.
“Isolator-based POC manufacturing directly supports both HE and EAP frameworks by enabling decentralized, small-scale production of ATMPs or EV therapies under GMP-compliant conditions within hospital settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HE typically focuses on treatments prepared and used within the same hospital.
- Interpretationnone given
POC manufacturing of cell- and EV-based therapies faces significant regulatory, operational, and technical hurdles.
“Despite its transformative potential, POC manufacturing of cell- and EV-based therapies faces significant regulatory, operational, and technical hurdles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regulatory ambiguity, workforce training limitations, and quality assurance gaps remain in decentralized settings.
- Interpretationreasoning
Ensuring sterility remains one of the primary challenges in implementing POC manufacturing.
“Ensuring sterility remains one of the primary challenges in implementing POC manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Hospitals and clinics present inherent risks of contamination due to high microbial burden and non-sterile environments.
- Rests on an assumption: ATMPs cannot undergo terminal sterilization.
- Premisecitation
If a cell-based therapy is considered a medical procedure, it may fall under medical practice regulations with limited oversight.
“If considered a medical procedure, the therapy may fall under medical practice regulations with limited oversight (Blanc et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blanc et al., 2025 source
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-based therapies often straddle the boundary between pharmaceutical products and medical procedures.
- Interpretationcitation
Isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards.
“Consequently, isolator workstations are now considered viable and attractive alternatives to classical cleanrooms, offering flexible, compact, and cost-efficient solutions to meet stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining high product quality and safety standards (Zanini et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zanini et al., 2020 source
- Interpretationcitation
Integration of isolator operations within electronic systems compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 ensures that all processing and environmental monitoring data are securely captured, traceable, and fully auditable.
“Integration of isolator operations within these electronic systems, compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 requirements for electronic records and signatures, ensures that all processing and environmental monitoring data are securely captured, traceable, and fully auditable (Food and Drug, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Food and Drug, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Isolator-based systems significantly reduce reliance on complex HVAC infrastructure necessary for conventional cleanroom manufacturing.
“By maintaining a closed and controlled environment, isolator-based systems significantly reduce reliance on the complex HVAC infrastructure necessary for conventional cleanroom manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Isolator systems are engineered as fully enclosed, sealed environments that can operate in less stringent background conditions, such as Grade C or D clean areas, without compromising sterility.
“In contrast, isolator systems are engineered as fully enclosed, sealed environments that can operate in less stringent background conditions, such as Grade C or D clean areas, without compromising sterility (Table 1) (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2023; Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
qPCR-based mycoplasma detection assays have largely replaced traditional culture methods due to their ability to deliver validated results within 1-4 h, supporting rapid batch release in POC settings.
“qPCR-based mycoplasma detection assays have largely replaced traditional culture methods due to their ability to deliver validated results within 1–4 h, supporting rapid batch release in POC settings (Becherucci et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Becherucci et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
In HE pathways, isolator-based POC manufacturing facilitates in-hospital preparation and immediate clinical use without centralized manufacturing.
“In HE pathways, this approach facilitates in-hospital preparation and immediate clinical use without centralized manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Isolator-based manufacturing platforms can support safe handling of both viral and non-viral gene transfer technologies.
“Nevertheless, isolator-based manufacturing platforms can support the safe handling of both viral and non-viral gene transfer technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
GMP compliance requires implementation of pharmacopeia-aligned QC strategies, including sterility, mycoplasma, and endotoxin testing, alongside rigorous product characterization.
“GMP compliance requires implementation of pharmacopeia-aligned QC strategies, including sterility, mycoplasma, and endotoxin testing, alongside rigorous product characterization (Council of Europe, 2023; United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Council of Europe, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Combining rapid sterility tests with isolator-based closed manufacturing environments can minimize patient and manufacturing risk by enabling timely product release while maintaining stringent sterility assurance.
“Combining these rapid sterility tests with isolator-based closed manufacturing environments can minimize patient and manufacturing risk by enabling timely product release while maintaining stringent sterility assurance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Isolator-based systems represent a cornerstone technology for implementation of decentralized, GMP-compliant biomanufacturing.
“In summary, isolator-based systems represent a cornerstone technology for the implementation of decentralized, GMP-compliant biomanufacturing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- May combine two claims. 32
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSterility assurance, process consistency, and batch reproducibility are essential to ensure product safety and efficacy.
“Key factors such as sterility assurance, process consistency, and batch reproducibility are essential to ensure product safety and efficacy (Stroncek et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Stroncek et al., 2010 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNon-genetically modified cell therapies and their derived extracellular vesicles are particularly promising because of lower regulatory complexity and potential for earlier clinical adoption.
“Among these, non-genetically modified cell therapies and their derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are particularly promising because of their lower regulatory complexity and potential for earlier clinical adoption (Wang et al., 2021; Bahmani and Ullah, 2022; Thom and Cronin, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2021 source
The Biological challenges section (page unavailable) describes non-genetically modified cells as a potentially useful alternative to genetic modification in clinical settings. The Regulatory challenges section (page unavailable) discusses approval barriers for cell therapies generally, but does not say that non-genetically modified therapies or their extracellular vesicles have lower regulatory complexity or could be adopted earlier. The retrieved passages do not address extracellular vesicles. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bahmani and Ullah, 2022 source
The Introduction and §2.3 (page unavailable) describe EVs as promising alternatives to cell therapies, citing therapeutic and safety advantages. They do not distinguish non-genetically modified therapies or attribute their promise to lower regulatory complexity or earlier clinical adoption. The Introduction and §5 instead note hurdles to clinical translation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Thom and Cronin, 2024 source
In “Regulating Novel Cellular Therapies” (page unavailable), the paper says genetically modified cells face additional directives, supporting a narrower point about regulatory burden. “The ATMP Bottleneck” discusses barriers to bringing cell therapies to market, but the paper does not establish that non-genetically modified therapies will be adopted earlier or address their derived extracellular vesicles. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPOC manufacturing is especially suited to autologous therapies by enabling onsite production, reducing transportation time, simplifying logistics, and shortening the vein-to-vein interval.
“Consequently, POC manufacturing is especially suited to these modalities by enabling onsite production within or near the clinical setting. This arrangement significantly reduces transportation time, simplifies logistics, and shortens the overall vein-to-vein interval (Harrison et al., 2017), which is critical for preserving cell viability and therapeutic potency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison et al., 2017 source
- Rests on an assumption: Autologous cell therapies often possess short therapeutic windows and limited cryostability.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEstablishing harmonized SOPs across sites, adopting digital batch records with centralized data monitoring, and enabling remote QA oversight could mitigate risks while ensuring consistent quality standards across multiple clinical settings.
“Establishing harmonized SOPs across sites, adopting digital batch records with centralized data monitoring, and enabling remote QA oversight, such as cloud-based audits or centralized review of production and release data, could mitigate these risks while ensuring consistent quality standards across multiple clinical settings (Harrison et al., 2018; Harrison et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Harrison et al., 2018 source
The ‘Decentralisation of QC’ section proposes a central QC hub receiving material or data from local sites, and the ‘Conclusions and forward-looking statement’ identifies site-to-site comparability as a goal. The cited passages do not propose harmonized SOPs, digital batch records, centralized data monitoring, or remote QA audits, nor do they establish that these measures would ensure consistent quality. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Harrison et al., 2017 source
In “Systems and technical security” (page unavailable), the paper calls for comparable quality-management systems and consistent standards across sites, and discusses integrated systems that communicate across sites to support oversight. In “Perspectives” (page unavailable), it describes collecting and logging network data. Our copy does not specify harmonized SOPs, digital batch records, remote QA, cloud-based audits, or centralized review of production and release data. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCentralized manufacturing facilities typically maintain dedicated QA departments and well-established SOPs, whereas decentralized POC sites may lack extensive experience implementing full GMP-compliant QA systems, increasing the risk of inconsistent product quality or regulatory non-compliance.
“Centralized manufacturing facilities typically maintain dedicated QA departments and well-established SOPs, whereas decentralized POC sites may lack extensive experience implementing full GMP-compliant QA systems, increasing the risk of inconsistent product quality or regulatory non-compliance (Shah et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Shah et al., 2023 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn cell- and EV-based therapies, maintaining strict QC is critical to ensuring safety, consistency, and therapeutic efficacy.
“In cell- and EV-based therapies, where the “process is the product,” maintaining strict quality control (QC) is critical to ensuring safety, consistency, and therapeutic efficacy (Rohde et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rohde et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Tissue Factory, an automated isolator-based platform, successfully manufactured multi-layered skeletal myoblast sheets, expanded human articular chondrocytes, and cultured human iPSCs across multiple passages without microbial contamination, demonstrating robust performance comparable to manual operations while minimizing operator intervention and contamination risks.
“This system successfully manufactured multi-layered skeletal myoblast sheets, expanded human articular chondrocytes, and cultured human iPSCs across multiple passages without microbial contamination, demonstrating robust performance comparable to manual operations while minimizing operator intervention and contamination risks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kikuchi et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmerging automated, closed-system platforms offer promising alternatives by minimizing human handling, reducing contamination risks, and increasing batch-to-batch consistency.
“Emerging automated, closed-system platforms—such as robotic cell culture systems and automated filling units—offer promising alternatives by minimizing human handling, reducing contamination risks, and increasing batch-to-batch consistency (Gupta and Shaz, 2025; Palani et al., 2023; Trainor et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Gupta and Shaz, 2025 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says automated platforms are increasingly used to streamline CAR T-cell production and may offer an opportunity to standardize manufacturing. It also says variability in protocols and product characteristics persists. The paper does not attribute reduced human handling, lower contamination risk, or greater batch-to-batch consistency to these platforms, and does not identify robotic cell culture systems or automated filling units. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Palani et al., 2023 source
- cites Trainor et al., 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCentralized manufacturing remains the dominant approach for allogeneic therapies due to economies of scale and well-established GMP infrastructure.
“Centralized manufacturing remains the dominant approach for such therapies due to its economies of scale and well-established GMP infrastructure (ten Ham et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites ten Ham et al., 2020 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says higher production volume may reduce facility costs and that sharing GMP facilities can spread costs and risks. It does not establish that centralized manufacturing is the dominant approach for allogeneic therapies, or that established GMP infrastructure explains such dominance. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Allogeneic cell and EV therapies can be manufactured at scale, cryopreserved, and distributed as off-the-shelf therapeutics.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutologous cell therapies are typically non-genetically modified, patient-specific, and manufactured in small batches.
“Autologous cell therapies, including autologous chondrocytes, BMSCs, ADSCs, and immune cell products such as CIK cells and DCs, are typically non-genetically modified, patient-specific, and manufactured in small batches (Marlovits et al., 2006; Wermke et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Marlovits et al., 2006 source
- cites Wermke et al., 2025 source
The Results (Manufacturing characteristics of TCR T drug product; page unavailable) describe a product made from patients’ own cells and report individual patient product characteristics, supporting the patient-specific aspect. The Methods (Manufacturing of IMA203 products; page unavailable) explicitly state that the T cells are genetically modified, contrary to the non-genetically-modified description. Neither section establishes that autologous cell therapies generally are manufactured in small batches. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay remains the gold standard for endotoxin detection and must be validated for use with each product type and formulation.
“The limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay remains the gold standard for endotoxin detection and must be validated for use with each product type and formulation (Gorman, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gorman, 2020 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) calls LAL the primary method for endotoxin testing in North America and Europe, supporting its established role but not an unqualified global ‘gold standard’ designation. The section on replacing biomedical horseshoe crab use discusses validation requirements for the alternative rFC test, not a requirement to validate LAL for each product type and formulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn IVF, fully enclosed isolator systems significantly improved embryo development to the blastocyst stage, yielding higher cell numbers and accelerated growth compared to conventional open-fronted laminar flow hoods, resulting in increased pregnancy and implantation rates.
“For example, in reproductive medicine, the implementation of fully enclosed isolator systems for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has significantly improved embryo development to the blastocyst stage, yielding higher cell numbers and accelerated growth compared to conventional open-fronted laminar flow hoods, ultimately resulting in increased pregnancy and implantation rates (Hyslop et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hyslop et al., 2012 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIntegration of isolator-based systems into POC models has potential to democratize access to cell and EV therapies by lowering barriers to clinical-grade production and enabling safer, more efficient delivery at the patient's bedside.
“Their integration into POC models has the potential to democratize access to cell and EV therapies by lowering barriers to clinical-grade production and enabling safer, more efficient delivery at the patient’s bedside.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCompared to RABS, isolators provide a fully sealed workspace with integrated decontamination and do not require installation within high-grade cleanroom environments.
“Compared to restricted access barrier systems (RABS), which offer partial separation and rely on the background cleanroom for contamination control, isolators provide a fully sealed workspace with integrated decontamination and do not require installation within high-grade cleanroom environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDirect fluorescent staining and membrane filtration approaches, as in ScanRDI, enable near real-time detection by capturing microorganisms on a membrane, staining with nucleic acid-binding fluorophores, and enumerating via laser scanning cytometry, reducing detection time to less than 3 h depending on bioburden levels.
“Alternatively, direct fluorescent staining and membrane filtration approaches, as employed in systems like ScanRDI, enable near real-time detection by capturing microorganisms on a membrane, staining with nucleic acid-binding fluorophores, and enumerating them via laser scanning cytometry, reducing detection time to less than 3 h depending on bioburden levels (Smith et al., 2010; Mohammadi et al.,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Smith et al., 2010
- cites Mohammadi et al., 2023 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationExpanded access programs provide a regulatory mechanism for compassionate use of investigational therapies in patients lacking alternative treatment options.
“In parallel, expanded access programs (EAPs) provide a regulatory mechanism for compassionate use of investigational therapies in patients lacking alternative treatment options (CellTrials, 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CellTrials, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPOC manufacturing, supported by isolator technology and automation, offers a promising pathway to making advanced therapies more accessible while maintaining the stringent standards necessary for clinical success.
“POC manufacturing, supported by isolator technology and automation, offers a promising pathway to making advanced therapies more accessible while maintaining the stringent standards necessary for clinical success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTogether, centralized cloud-based MES/eBR, centralized QA oversight, and standardized digital SOPs directly address challenges of standardization and centralized data monitoring, facilitating robust quality assurance across diverse clinical manufacturing settings.
“Together, these approaches directly address the challenges of standardization and centralized data monitoring, facilitating robust quality assurance across diverse clinical manufacturing settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Implementation of centralized cloud-based MES and eBR platforms enables real-time data collection, monitoring, and cross-site analysis, ensuring consistent process parameters, environmental monitoring, and product release criteria across decentralized sites.
- Rests on an assumption: Centralized QA oversight structures can review and harmonize batch release decisions, while standardized digital SOPs further enforce procedural uniformity.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy combining isolator-based closed-system manufacturing with in-hospital QC testing, POC models can ensure timely release of safe, GMP-compliant cell and EV products.
“By combining isolator-based closed-system manufacturing with in-hospital QC testing, POC models can ensure timely release of safe, GMP-compliant cell and EV products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIsolators are completely closed systems that maintain asepsis independent of the surrounding environment, unlike BSCs.
“Unlike biological safety cabinets (BSCs), which provide open-front airflow protection within classified cleanrooms, isolators are completely closed systems that maintain asepsis independent of the surrounding environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsolator-based systems are sealed containment devices that physically separate operators from the manufacturing environment, thereby maintaining aseptic conditions.
“Isolator-based systems are widely employed in the pharmaceutical industry as sealed containment devices designed to physically separate operators from the manufacturing environment, thereby maintaining aseptic conditions (Levitan and Perry, 1968; Akers, 2015; Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Levitan and Perry, 1968 source
- cites Akers, 2015
- cites Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClassification as a medicinal product-particularly as an ATMP-triggers compliance with full PIC/S GMP standards, sterility assurance requirements, and formal product release testing.
“Conversely, classification as a medicinal product—particularly as an ATMP—triggers compliance with full pharmaceutical inspection convention and co-operation scheme (PIC/S) GMP standards, sterility assurance requirements (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2023), and formal product release testing (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022; Ilic et al., 2012a;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ilic et al., 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-based therapies often straddle the boundary between pharmaceutical products and medical procedures.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIsolators serve as a cost-effective infrastructure option by lowering cleanroom classification requirements, reducing facility construction and operational costs.
“Second, they serve as a cost-effective infrastructure option by lowering cleanroom classification requirements, thereby reducing facility construction and operational costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUse of pyrogen-free materials and closed-system fluidics within isolators reduces endotoxin contamination risks.
“The use of pyrogen-free materials and closed-system fluidics within isolators further reduces endotoxin contamination risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIsolator systems can be easily integrated with automated culture, monitoring, and filling technologies, enhancing process standardization and scalability.
“Third, isolator systems can be easily integrated with automated culture, monitoring, and filling technologies, enhancing both process standardization and scalability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPOC manufacturing minimizes transportation risks, reduces time-to-treatment, and may allow administration of fresh, non-cryopreserved products.
“By enabling on-site manufacturing within or near the clinical setting, POC models minimize transportation risks, reduce time-to-treatment, and may allow for the administration of fresh, non-cryopreserved products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWidespread adoption of POC manufacturing for cell and EV therapies will require harmonized regulations, targeted workforce development, standardized operational protocols, and continued innovation in GMP-compatible bioprocessing systems.
“While automation and isolator-based manufacturing technologies have begun to lower some barriers, widespread adoption of POC manufacturing for cell and EV therapies will require harmonized regulations, targeted workforce development, standardized operational protocols, and continued innovation in GMP-compatible bioprocessing systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regulatory alignment across countries remains inconsistent, complicating international deployment and harmonized practice standards.
- Rests on an assumption: Limitations in workforce availability and technical expertise remain major barriers to POC manufacturing implementation.
- Rests on an assumption: Effective operation of POC manufacturing requires multidisciplinary teams proficient in aseptic processing, clinical-grade reagent handling, and QC testing.
- Rests on an assumption: Operators must be trained to perform or supervise critical processes such as sterility assurance, mycoplasma testing, endotoxin screening, and advanced analytics for cell and EV characterization.
- Rests on an assumption: The availability of such skilled personnel is often limited, particularly in smaller clinical centers.
- Rests on an assumption: Maintaining operator proficiency within GMP frameworks introduces significant training and documentation burdens.
- Rests on an assumption: Infrastructure and automation remain additional constraints on scalability.
- Rests on an assumption: Isolator-based systems' setup and operation still require stringent environmental controls, validated decontamination procedures, and ongoing maintenance.
- Rests on an assumption: The availability of isolator systems within clinical centers is often limited by high capital costs, spatial requirements, and maintenance demands, particularly outside large academic hospitals.
- Rests on an assumption: Emerging automated, closed-system technologies remain costly and are not yet widely adopted in clinical practice.
- Rests on an assumption: QA and regulatory compliance in decentralized settings pose further challenges.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOverall, isolator-based POC platforms offer modularity, scalability, and high contamination control, making them enabling technologies for distributed manufacturing of both autologous and selected allogeneic therapies.
“Overall, isolator-based POC platforms offer modularity, scalability, and a high degree of contamination control, making them enabling technologies for distributed manufacturing of both autologous and selected allogeneic therapies (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIsolator-based closed systems allow gene transduction, cell expansion, and final formulation within a fully contained, GMP-compliant environment, minimizing environmental contamination risks and making onsite production of certain gene-modified therapies technically viable.
“These closed systems allow critical steps, gene transduction, cell expansion, and final formulation, to be performed within a fully contained, GMP-compliant environment, thereby minimizing environmental contamination risks and making onsite production of certain gene-modified therapies technically viable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningFor small and medium-sized biotech companies or academic institutions aiming to meet GMP standards, isolator-based systems present a practical solution.
“For small and medium-sized biotech companies or academic institutions aiming to meet GMP standards, isolator-based systems present a practical solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEVs are characterized according to MISEV2018 guidelines; key parameters include size and morphology (30-150 nm) via NTA or TEM, marker profiling including tetraspanins and exclusion of non-EV proteins, and cargo analysis.
“EVs are characterized according to the MISEV2018 guidelines published by the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) (Théry et al., 2018).”
- Also stated in: § EV characterization · plain
“Key parameters include: (1) Size and morphology (typically 30–150 nm) via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM). (2) Marker profiling, including tetraspanins (CD63, CD81, CD9) and exclusion of non-EV proteins (e.g., GM130, Calnexin) (3) Cargo analysis, such as protein and RNA content via Western blotting, ELISA, or sequencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Théry et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § EV characterization · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor MSCs, the ISCT outlines three defining criteria: plastic adherence, expression of surface markers CD105, CD73, CD90 with negative hematopoietic markers, and trilineage differentiation potential.
“For MSCs, the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) outlines three defining criteria: (1) plastic adherence under standard culture conditions, (2) expression of surface markers CD105, CD73, and CD90, with negative expression of hematopoietic markers (e.g., CD45, CD34, CD14/CD11b, CD79α/CD19, HLA-DR), and (3) trilineage differentiation potential into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dominici et al., 2006 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPOC manufacturing may improve patient accessibility and streamline operational costs.
“This approach may improve patient accessibility and streamline operational costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn EAP contexts, isolator-based POC enables on-demand preparation of personalized products while ensuring regulatory-required quality standards.
“In EAP contexts, where rapid provision of investigational therapies is critical for patients without alternatives, isolator-based POC enables on-demand preparation of personalized products while ensuring regulatory-required quality standards, thus bridging operational feasibility and compassionate use regulatory frameworks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIsolator-based platforms reduce supply chain complexity, enhance sterility assurance, and preserve biological integrity of sensitive ATMPs by enabling the entire workflow within a controlled closed environment at or near the bedside.
“By enabling the entire workflow—from tissue acquisition and cell processing to final formulation and reinfusion—to be carried out within a controlled, closed environment at or near the patient’s bedside, isolator-based platforms reduce supply chain complexity, enhance sterility assurance, and preserve the biological integrity of sensitive ATMPs (Savry et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savry et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn hospitals with high patient throughput, establishing in-house production facilities may offer clinical and operational advantages by ensuring consistent supply, reducing reliance on external CDMOs, and enabling rapid adaptation to local clinical needs.
“However, in hospitals with high patient throughput, establishing in-house production facilities may offer both clinical and operational advantages by ensuring consistent supply, reducing reliance on external CDMOs, and enabling rapid adaptation to local clinical needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIsolators minimize human intervention and environmental exposure, significantly reducing risk of microbial contamination.
“First, they minimize human intervention and environmental exposure, significantly reducing the risk of microbial contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsolators operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety, reduce facility operational complexity and cost, and enable reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.
“Isolators, operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds, provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety. They also reduce facility operational complexity and cost, enabling reproducible GMP-compliant manufacturing of ATMPs at larger scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zanini et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsolator-based technologies have revolutionized aseptic processing over the past two decades by separating human operators from the production environment, reducing contamination risks and enabling safe manufacture of heat-labile or sensitive biological products.
“Indeed, isolator-based technologies have revolutionized aseptic processing over the past two decades by effectively separating human operators from the production environment, thereby dramatically reducing contamination risks and enabling the safe manufacture of heat-labile or sensitive biological products (Kokubo et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kokubo et al., 2016 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Hospitals and clinics present inherent risks of contamination due to high microbial burden and non-sterile environments.
“Nonetheless, hospitals and clinics present inherent risks of contamination due to their high microbial burden and non-sterile environments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ATMPs cannot undergo terminal sterilization.
“Since ATMPs cannot undergo terminal sterilization, rigorous aseptic processing and comprehensive quality control are essential (Harrison et al., 2017).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Autologous cell therapies often possess short therapeutic windows and limited cryostability.
“These therapies often possess short therapeutic windows and limited cryostability, making fresh, on-demand production particularly advantageous.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Allogeneic cell and EV therapies can be manufactured at scale, cryopreserved, and distributed as off-the-shelf therapeutics.
“These products can be manufactured at scale, cryopreserved, and distributed as off-the-shelf therapeutics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sterility is a mandatory release criterion for all injectable ATMPs.
“Sterility is a mandatory release criterion for all injectable ATMPs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional compendial sterility testing requires a 14-day incubation period.
“Traditionally, compendial sterility testing requires a 14-day incubation period, delaying product release and posing logistical challenges for fresh, non-cryopreserved therapies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Endotoxins are lipopolysaccharide components of Gram-negative bacteria that can trigger severe immune responses if administered intravenously.
“Endotoxins are lipopolysaccharide (LPS) components of Gram-negative bacteria that can trigger severe immune responses if administered intravenously.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cell-based therapies often straddle the boundary between pharmaceutical products and medical procedures.
“Cell-based therapies often straddle the boundary between pharmaceutical products and medical procedures, a classification with substantial regulatory implications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Within hospital-based POC manufacturing, positive pressure isolators are most commonly employed.
“Within hospital-based POC manufacturing, positive pressure isolators are most commonly employed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regulatory ambiguity, workforce training limitations, and quality assurance gaps remain in decentralized settings.
“Despite these advantages, challenges remain, including regulatory ambiguity, workforce training limitations, and quality assurance gaps in decentralized settings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HE typically focuses on treatments prepared and used within the same hospital.
“While HE typically focuses on treatments prepared and used within the same hospital”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regulatory alignment across countries remains inconsistent, complicating international deployment and harmonized practice standards.
“However, regulatory alignment across countries remains inconsistent, complicating international deployment and harmonized practice standards.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Limitations in workforce availability and technical expertise remain major barriers to POC manufacturing implementation.
“Beyond regulatory ambiguity, limitations in workforce availability and technical expertise remain major barriers to POC manufacturing implementation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Effective operation of POC manufacturing requires multidisciplinary teams proficient in aseptic processing, clinical-grade reagent handling, and QC testing.
“Effective operation requires multidisciplinary teams proficient in aseptic processing, clinical-grade reagent handling, and QC testing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Operators must be trained to perform or supervise critical processes such as sterility assurance, mycoplasma testing, endotoxin screening, and advanced analytics for cell and EV characterization.
“Operators must be trained to perform or supervise critical processes such as sterility assurance, mycoplasma testing, endotoxin screening, and advanced analytics for cell and EV characterization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The availability of such skilled personnel is often limited, particularly in smaller clinical centers.
“However, the availability of such skilled personnel is often limited, particularly in smaller clinical centers”
The paper relies on this without support.
Maintaining operator proficiency within GMP frameworks introduces significant training and documentation burdens.
“maintaining operator proficiency within GMP frameworks introduces significant training and documentation burdens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Implementation of centralized cloud-based MES and eBR platforms enables real-time data collection, monitoring, and cross-site analysis, ensuring consistent process parameters, environmental monitoring, and product release criteria across decentralized sites.
“These digital systems enable real-time data collection, monitoring, and cross-site analysis, ensuring consistent process parameters, environmental monitoring, and product release criteria across decentralized sites.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Centralized QA oversight structures can review and harmonize batch release decisions, while standardized digital SOPs further enforce procedural uniformity.
“Additionally, centralized quality assurance (QA) oversight structures can review and harmonize batch release decisions, while standardized digital standard operating procedures (SOPs) further enforce procedural uniformity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Infrastructure and automation remain additional constraints on scalability.
“Infrastructure and automation remain additional constraints on scalability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Isolator-based systems' setup and operation still require stringent environmental controls, validated decontamination procedures, and ongoing maintenance.
“While isolator-based systems reduce reliance on traditional cleanrooms, their setup and operation still require stringent environmental controls, validated decontamination procedures, and ongoing maintenance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The availability of isolator systems within clinical centers is often limited by high capital costs, spatial requirements, and maintenance demands, particularly outside large academic hospitals.
“Furthermore, the availability of isolator systems within clinical centers is often limited by high capital costs, spatial requirements, and maintenance demands, particularly outside large academic hospitals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Emerging automated, closed-system technologies remain costly and are not yet widely adopted in clinical practice.
“However, these technologies remain costly and are not yet widely adopted in clinical practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
QA and regulatory compliance in decentralized settings pose further challenges.
“QA and regulatory compliance in decentralized settings pose further challenges.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting background-room requirements for isolators
MinorThe paper says isolators can provide an ISO Class 5 environment in non-classified hospital rooms, but later describes them as operating within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds. It is unclear whether a classified background room is required for the proposed point-of-care setup.
“enabling ISO Class 5 environments within non-classified hospital rooms”
“Isolators, operating as Grade A environments within at least Grade D cleanroom backgrounds, provide superior sterility assurance and operator safety.”
Cites
Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., Krause, D. S., Deans, R. J., Keating, A., Prockop, D. J., & Horwitz, E. M. (2006) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1080/14653240600855905 · Cited by 17,766 · see citing works
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., Antoniou, A., Arab, T., Archer, F., Atkin‐Smith, G. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · Cited by 11,099 · see citing works
Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O'Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di Vizio, D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., et al. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12404 · Cited by 4,663 · see citing works
Hass, R., Kasper, C., Böhm, S., & Jacobs, R. (2011) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/1478-811x-9-12 · Cited by 1,756 · see citing works
Human dendritic cell subsets: an update
Collin, M., & Bigley, V. (2018) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.12888 · Cited by 1,301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DCs are identi fi ed by high expression of CD11c and HLA-DR, with co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86 used to con fi rm identity and maturation status (Szabolcs et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2009; Collin and Bigley, 2018).”
In Vivo Analysis of Dendritic Cell Development and Homeostasis
Liu, K., Victora, G. D., Schwickert, T. A., Guermonprez, P., Meredith, M. M., Yao, K.-H., Chu, F.-F., Randolph, G. J., Rudensky, A. Y., & Nussenzweig, M. C. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170540 · Cited by 953 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DCs are identi fi ed by high expression of CD11c and HLA-DR, with co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86 used to con fi rm identity and maturation status (Szabolcs et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2009; Collin and Bigley, 2018).”
Advances in In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Gene Expression
Contag, C. H., & Bachmann, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.111901.093336 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Natural killer cells in cancer biology and therapy
Wu, S.-Y., Fu, T., Jiang, Y.-Z., & Shao, Z.-M. (2020) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01238-x · Cited by 863 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Immune cell-based therapies, including cytokine induced killer (CIK) cells (Schmeel et al., 2015), natural killer (NK) cells (Wu et al., 2020), dendritic cells (DCs) (Li et al., 2009), and gamma-delta ( γδ ) T cells (Arias-Badia et al., 2024), have demonstrated promising antitumor activity in…”
Nakagawa, M., Taniguchi, Y., Senda, S., Takizawa, N., Ichisaka, T., Asano, K., Morizane, A., Doi, D., Takahashi, J., Nishizawa, M., et al. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03594 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Exosome Processing and Characterization Approaches for Research and Technology Development
Lai, J. J., Chau, Z. L., Chen, S., Hill, J. J., Korpany, K. V., Liang, N., Lin, L., Lin, Y., Liu, J. K., Liu, Y., et al. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202103222 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation
Marlovits, S., Zeller, P., Singer, P., Resinger, C., & Vécsei, V. (2006) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.009 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Autologous cell therapies, including autologous chondrocytes, BMSCs, ADSCs, and immune cell products such as CIK cells and DCs, are typically non-genetically modi fi ed, patient-speci fi c, and manufactured in small batches (Marlovits et al., 2006; Wermke et al., 2025).”
Schmidt‐Wolf, I. G. H., Lefterova, P., Mehta, B. A., et al. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy
Abou-el-Enein, M., Elsallab, M., Feldman, S. A., Fesnak, A. D., Heslop, H. E., Marks, P., Till, B. G., Bauer, G., & Savoldo, B. (2021) · Blood Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0084 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Rohde, E., Pachler, K., & Gimona, M. (2019) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.12.006 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Junttila, T. T., Parsons, K. L., Olsson, C., Lu, Y., Xin, Y., Theriault, J., Crocker, L., Pabonan, O., Baginski, T., Meng, G., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3704 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Szabolcs, P., Avigan, D., Gezelter, S., Ciocon, D., Moore, M., Steinman, R. M., & Young, J. W. (1996) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v87.11.4520.bloodjournal87114520 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Maniar, A., Zhang, X., Lin, W., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-234211 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Wang, S., Racila, E. V., Taylor, R. P., & Weiner, G. J. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-02-074716 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Cryopreservation as a Key Element in the Successful Delivery of Cell-Based Therapies—A Review
Meneghel, J., Kilbride, P., & Morris, G. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.592242 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…are particularly signi fi cant for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022), which are often administered shortly after culture or thawing and tend to be sensitive to cryopreservation (Meneghel et al., 2020; Joules et al., 2025).”
Wang, L. L., Janes, M. E., Kumbhojkar, N., Kapate, N., Clegg, J. R., Prakash, S., Heavey, M. K., Zhao, Z., Anselmo, A. C., & Mitragotri, S. (2021) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10214 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Immunological considerations and challenges for regenerative cellular therapies
Petrus-Reurer, S., Romano, M., Howlett, S., Jones, J., Lombardi, G., & Saeb‐Parsy, K. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02237-4 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Schmeel, L. C., Schmeel, F. C., Coch, C., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-014-1864-3 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
γδ T Cells: The Ideal Tool for Cancer Immunotherapy
Yazdanifar, M., Barbarito, G., Bertaina, A., & Airoldi, I. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9051305 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…typically co-express CD3 as part of the TCR complex, while CD45RA and CD27 are used for further subset characterization into naïve, central memory, effector memory, and terminally differentiated phenotypes (Yazdanifar et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021; Barros-Martins et al., 2022; Sanz et al., 2023).”
Copp, G., Robb, K. P., & Viswanathan, S. (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41423-023-01020-1 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs),are primarily being investigated for the treatment of chronic and degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (Copp et al., 2023; Cao et al., 2025), Parkinson ’ s disease (Heris et al., 2022), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Zheng et al., 2022), as well as…”
Measuring Cytotoxicity by Bioluminescence Imaging Outperforms the Standard Chromium-51 Release Assay
Karimi, M. A., Lee, E., Bachmann, M. H., Salicioni, A. M., Behrens, E. M., Kambayashi, T., & Baldwin, C. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089357 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: Hope for Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Li, A., Guo, F., Pan, Q., Chen, J., Chen, J., Liu, H.-F., & Pan, Q. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.728190 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The potential use of mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes in Parkinson’s disease treatment
Mosaddeghi-Heris, R., Shirvaliloo, M., Abbaspour‐Aghdam, S., Hazrati, A., Shariati, A., Youshanlouei, H. R., Jadidi‐Niaragh, F., Valizadeh, H., & Ahmadi, M. (2022) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-022-03050-4 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Current perspectives on mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for graft versus host disease
Kadri, N., Amu, S., Iacobaeus, E., Boberg, E., & Blanc, K. L. (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41423-023-01022-z · Cited by 115 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…’ s disease (Heris et al., 2022), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Zheng et al., 2022), as well as for immunomodulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (Li et al., 2021; Farge et al., 2025) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (Che et al., 2020; Kadri et al., 2023; Blanc et al., 2025).”
Li, H., Wang, C., Yu, J., et al. (2009) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.3109/14653240903121252 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Advances in clinical NK cell studies: Donor selection, manufacturing and quality control
Koehl, U., Kalberer, C. P., Spanholtz, J., Lee, D. A., Miller, J. S., Cooley, S., Lowdell, M. W., Uharek, L., Klingemann, H., Curti, A., et al. (2015) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2015.1115178 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Linn, Y. C., Lau, S. K. J., Liu, B. H., et al. (2008) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02910.x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Palani, H. K., Arunachalam, A. K., Yasar, M., Venkatraman, A., Kulkarni, U., Lionel, S. A., Selvarajan, S., Korula, A., Abraham, A., George, B., et al. (2023) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-022-01866-5 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Ahmad, A., Shahab Uddin, M. S., & Steinhoff, M. S. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21113906 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Graft Versus Host Disease: Mechanism-Based Biomarkers
Cheung, T. S., Bertolino, G. M., Giacomini, C., Bornhäuser, M., Dazzi, F., & Galleu, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01338 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Xue, D., Lu, S., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Dai, Z., Kaufman, D. S., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.02.003 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Overview of FDA's expanded access program for investigational drugs
Jarow, J. P., Lurie, P., Ikenberry, S. C., & Lemery, S. (2017) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479017694850 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While HE typically focuses on treatments prepared and used within the same hospital, EAPs can enable broader access to investigational products across institutions prior to formal market approval (Klopfenstein et al., 2015; Jarow et al., 2017).”
Different sourced extracellular vesicles and their potential applications in clinical treatments
Bahmani, L., & Ullah, M. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11131989 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
CAR-engineered NK cells; a promising therapeutic option for treatment of hematological malignancies
Marofi, F., Saleh, M. M., Rahman, H. S., Suksatan, W., Al-Gazally, M. E., Abdelbasset, W. K., Thangavelu, L. P., Yumashev, A. V., Hassanzadeh, A., Yazdanifar, M., et al. (2021) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-021-02462-y · Cited by 81 · see citing works
The paths and challenges of “off-the-shelf” CAR-T cell therapy: an overview of clinical trials
Moradi, V., Omidkhoda, A., & Ahmadbeigi, N. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115888 · Cited by 80 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gene-modi fi ed therapies, including iPSC-derived products and CAR-T cells, present distinct biosafety and technical challenges for POC implementation (Nakagawa et al., 2014; Moradi et al., 2023).”
Manufacturing cell and gene therapies: challenges in clinical translation
Lee, N. K., & Chang, J. W. (2024) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2023.0382 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Promises and challenges of a decentralized CAR T-cell manufacturing model
Shah, M., Krull, A., Odonnell, L., de Lima, M. J., & Bezerra, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Transplantation · doi:10.3389/frtra.2023.1238535 · Cited by 77 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…fi cantlyreduces time between manufacturing and patient treatment. harvesting, and fi nal formulation within a single sterile unit, offering a streamlined approach to manufacturing ATMPs near the point of care (Harrison et al., 2017; Shah et al., 2023).”
ten Ham, R. M. T., Hövels, A. M., Hoekman, J., Frederix, G. W. J., Leufkens, H. G. M., Klungel, O. H., Jedema, I., Veld, S. A. J., Nikolic, T., Van Pel, M., et al. (2020) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.03.432 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Autologous T cell therapy for PRAME+ advanced solid tumors in HLA-A*02+ patients: a phase 1 trial
Wermke, M., Araujo, D. M., Chatterjee, M., Tsimberidou, A. M., Holderried, T. A. W., Jazaeri, A. A., Reshef, R., Bokemeyer, C., Alsdorf, W., Wetzko, K., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03650-6 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Harrison, R. P., Ruck, S., Medcalf, N., & Rafiq, Q. A. (2017) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.07.005 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Lim, S. H., Mix, S., Xu, Z., Taba, B., Budvytiene, I., Berliner, A. N., Queralto, N., Churi, Y. S., Huang, R. S., Eiden, M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02377-13 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Cao, M., Ou, Z., Sheng, R., Wang, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Dai, G.-C., Wang, H., Li, J., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-025-04252-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The flow cytometric PKH-26 assay for the determination of T-cell mediated cytotoxic activity
Fischer, K., & Mackensen, A. (2003) · Methods · doi:10.1016/s1046-2023(03)00123-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
γδ T cells as critical anti-tumor immune effectors
Arias-Badia, M., Chang, R., & Fong, L. H. (2024) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-024-00798-x · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Progress and challenges in developing allogeneic cell therapies
Deuse, T., & Schrepfer, S. (2025) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.03.004 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Allogeneic therapies require stringent immunological and functional criteria to minimize graft-versus-host or host-versus-graft responses (Deuse and Schrepfer, 2025).”
Blanc, K. L., Dazzi, F., English, K., Farge, D., Galipeau, J., Horwitz, E. M., Kadri, N., Krampera, M., Lalu, M. M., Nolta, J., et al. (2025) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.01.005 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Reference values for T, B and NK human lymphocyte subpopulations in adults
Apoil, P. A., Puissant‐Lubrano, B., Congy‐Jolivet, N., et al. (2017) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.019 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Deep characterization of human γδ T cell subsets defines shared and lineage-specific traits
Sanz, M., Mann, B. T., Ryan, P. L., Bosque, A., Pennington, D. J., Hackstein, H., & Soriano-Sarabia, N. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1148988 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…typically co-express CD3 as part of the TCR complex, while CD45RA and CD27 are used for further subset characterization into naïve, central memory, effector memory, and terminally differentiated phenotypes (Yazdanifar et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021; Barros-Martins et al., 2022; Sanz et al., 2023).”
Automated production of gene-modified chimeric antigen receptor T cells using the Cocoon Platform
Trainor, N., Purpura, K. A., Middleton, K., Fargo, K., Hails, L., Vicentini-Hogan, M., McRobie, C., Daniels, R., Densham, P., Gardin, P., et al. (2023) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.07.012 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lam, C., Meinert, E., Yang, A., & Cui, Z. (2021) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.08.007 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The use of an isolator system in cancer chemotherapy
Levitan, A. A., & Perry, S. (1968) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(68)90155-1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Harrison, R. P., Rafiq, Q. A., & Medcalf, N. (2018) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.05.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Perales, M., Anderson, L. D., Jain, T., Kenderian, S. S., Oluwole, O. O., Shah, G. L., Svoboda, J., & Hamadani, M. (2022) · Transplantation and Cellular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2022.06.019 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kikuchi, T., Kino-oka, M., Wada, M., Kobayashi, T., Kato, M., Takeda, S., Kubo, H., Ogawa, T., Sunayama, H., Tanimoto, K., et al. (2018) · Regenerative Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.reth.2018.08.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gorman, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.582132 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay remains the gold standard for endotoxin detection and must be validated for use with each product type and formulation (Gorman, 2020).”
Ilic, N., Savic, S. D., Siegel, E., et al. (2012) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.5966/sctm.2012-0037 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
MHC Class I Enables MSCs to Evade NK-Cell–Mediated Cytotoxicity and Exert Immunosuppressive Activity
Oh, J. Y., Kim, H., Lee, H. J., Lee, K., Barreda, H., Kim, H. J., Shin, E., Bae, E., Kaur, G., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1093/stmcls/sxac043 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“NK cells, γδ T cells, and MSCs are particularly attractive for allogeneic use due to their immunological properties and low risk of eliciting strong host immune responses (Petrus-Reurer et al., 2021; Oh et al., 2022).”
Gupta, D., & Shaz, B. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06400-x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
MHC restricted and non-restricted killer lymphocytes
Rees, R. C. (1990) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/0268-960x(90)90049-x · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their antitumor activities do not rely on classical antigen presentation pathways (Rees, 1990; Maniar et al., 2010), facilitating the development of off-the-shelf, allogeneic immunotherapies that can be administered to multiple patients without the need for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching or…”
Emerging approaches for preventing cytokine release syndrome in CAR-T cell therapy
Balagopal, S., Sasaki, K., Kaur, P., Nikolaidi, M., & Ishihara, J. (2022) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d2tb00592a · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Despite their clinical success, CAR-T therapies remain limited by complex, time-consuming, and high-cost manufacturing, as well as potential adverse effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity (Balagopal et al., 2022; Gatto et al., 2023).”
Barros‐Martins, J., Bruni, E., Fichtner, A. S., et al. (2022) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.24564 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Sánchez-Guijo, F., Avendaño-Solá, C., Badimón, L., Bueren, J. A., Canals, J. M., Delgadillo, J., Delgado, J., Eguizábal, C., Fernández-Santos, M.-E., García-Olmo, D., et al. (2023) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-023-01962-0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Gatto, L., Ricciotti, I., Tosoni, A., di Nunno, V., Bartolini, S., Ranieri, L., & Franceschi, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1206983 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Bugno, A., Lira, R. S., Oliveira, W. A., Almodovar, A. A. B., Saes, D. P. S., & de Jesus Andreoli Pinto, T. (2015) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1590/s1517-838246320140587 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Applications of cell therapy in the treatment of virus-associated cancers
Toner, K., McCann, C. D., & Bollard, C. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00930-x · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(CIK) cells (Schmeel et al., 2015), natural killer (NK) cells (Wu et al., 2020), dendritic cells (DCs) (Li et al., 2009), and gamma-delta ( γδ ) T cells (Arias-Badia et al., 2024), have demonstrated promising antitumor activity in cancer immunotherapy (Takimoto et al., 2023; Toner et al., 2024).”
Chen, J., Huang, Q.-Y., Chen, W., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.899666 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A novel isolator-based system promotes viability of human embryos during laboratory processing
Hyslop, L., Prathalingam, N., Nowak, L., Fenwick, J., Harbottle, S., Byerley, S., Rhodes, J., Watson, B., Henderson, R., Murdoch, A., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031010 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…vitro fertilization (IVF) has signi fi cantly improved embryo development to the blastocyst stage, yielding higher cell numbers and accelerated growth compared to conventional open-fronted laminar fl ow hoods, ultimately resulting in increased pregnancy and implantation rates (Hyslop et al., 2012).”
(2010) · PubMed · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rodrigues, M., Duran, E., Eschgfäller, B., et al. (2021) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-144897 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The manufacturing process for these therapies involves genetic manipulation steps, such as viral transduction or non-viral gene editing, which require stringent containment to prevent vector leakage and ensure operator safety (Maro fi et al., 2021; Abou-El-Enein et al., 2021; Rodrigues et al., 2021).”
Ilić, N., Savic, S. D., Siegel, E., et al. (2012) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.5966/sctm.2012-0038 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Needle to needle <scp>robot‐assisted</scp> manufacture of cell therapy products
Ochs, J., Hanga, M. P., Shaw, G., Duffy, N., Kulik, M., Tissin, N., Reibert, D., Biermann, F., Moutsatsou, P., Ratnayake, S., et al. (2022) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10387 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Integrating robotic arms within isolator systems represents a promising hybrid approach, enabling high-throughput, GMP-compliant cell manufacturing in compact, modular setups (Melocchi et al., 2024; Ochs et al., 2022).”
CAR Beyond αβ T Cells: Unleashing NK Cells, Macrophages, and γδ T Lymphocytes Against Solid Tumors
Xian, Y., & Wen, L. (2025) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines13060654 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Wu, J. F., & Dhakal, B. (2023) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01479-5 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with approved products targeting relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and, more recently, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-positive multiple myeloma (Ahmad et al., 2020; Perales et al., 2022; Wu and Dhakal, 2023).”
Zheng, C., Chiu, I., Chen, Y., Hsu, Y., Hung, L., Wu, M., Lin, Y., Liao, C., Hung, Y., Tsai, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.17310 · Cited by 16 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In contrast, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs),are primarily being investigated for the treatment of chronic and degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (Copp et al., 2023; Cao et al., 2025), Parkinson ’ s disease (Heris et al., 2022), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Zheng et al., 2022), as well as for immunomod…”
Jahan, F., Penna, L., Luostarinen, A., Veltman, L., Hongisto, H., Lähteenmäki, K., Müller, S., Ylä‐Herttuala, S., Korhonen, M. O., Vettenranta, K. K., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76791-2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Characterization of human natural killer cells for therapeutic use
Wagner, A. K., Alici, E., & Lowdell, M. W. (2019) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.11.001 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CD16 expression is variably documented to distinguish functional subsets (Koehl et al., 2016; Wagner et al., 2019; Jahan et al., 2024). γδ T cells are identi fi ed by T cell receptor (TCR) γδ expression, distinguishing them from conventional αβ T cells.”
Development of a robotic cluster for automated and scalable cell therapy manufacturing
Melocchi, A., Schmittlein, B., Jones, A. L., Ainane, Y., Rizvi, A., Chan, D., Dickey, E., Pool, K., Harsono, K., Szymkiewicz, D., et al. (2024) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.03.010 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Farge, D., Biard, L., Weil, B., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00298-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
51Cr-release to monitor NK cell cytotoxicity
Elsner, L., & Dressel, R. (2019) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2019.05.037 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…primarily evaluate cytotoxic activity against tumor or pathogen-infected cell lines using either traditional radioactive chromium-51 release assays (Elsner and Dressel, 2020), non-radioactive fl ow cytometry-based killing assays (Fischer and Mackensen, 2003), or luminescence-based assays that…”
Quality assessment of cellular therapies: the emerging role of molecular assays
Stroncek, D. F., Jin, P., Ren, J., Feng, J., Castiello, L., Civini, S., Wang, E., Marincola, F. M., & Sabatino, M. (2010) · The Korean Journal of Hematology · doi:10.5045/kjh.2010.45.1.14 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Legal and regulatory challenges for emerging regenerative medicine solutions for Diabetes
Thom, R. L., Cronin, A. J., & the VANGUARD Consortium (2024) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000004797 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Isolation Technology for Research and Development Applications: From Concept to Production
Krishna, A. K., Lodhi, S., & Harris, M. R. (2000) · Pharmaceutical Development and Technology · doi:10.1081/pdt-100102034 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…peroxide (VHP) cycles, sporicidal decontamination), and independent heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) fi ltration modules, enabling ISO Class 5 environments within non-classi fi ed hospital rooms (Krishna et al., 2000; International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2004).”
Expanded access programs: Ethical and practical considerations for Biopharmaceutical Sponsors
Klopfenstein, M., Van Campen, L. E., & Garnett, T. (2015) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479015578154 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While HE typically focuses on treatments prepared and used within the same hospital, EAPs can enable broader access to investigational products across institutions prior to formal market approval (Klopfenstein et al., 2015; Jarow et al., 2017).”
Aseptic simulation test for cytotoxic drug production in isolators
Savry, A., Correard, F., Bennis, Y., Roubaud, S., Gauthier-Villano, L., Pisano, P., & Pourroy, B. (2014) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp130343 · Cited by 11 · cited 9× · see citing works
“These challenges are particularly signi fi cant for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022), which are often administered shortly after culture or thawing and tend to be sensitive to cryopreservation (Meneghel et al., 2020; Joules et al., 2025).”
InfluentialGood design practices for an integrated containment and production system for advanced therapies
Zanini, C., Severina, F., Lando, G., Fanizza, C., Cesana, E., Desidera, D., & Bonifacio, M. (2020) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27376 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Creating a GMP cell processing program: a focus on quality and regulation
Patel, D., Reese Koç, J., & Otegbeye, F. (2025) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology · doi:10.1016/j.beha.2025.101614 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Williams, K. B., & Ehrhart, N. P. (2022) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.22.02.0060 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Regarded by some as the foundation of “ Cell Therapy 2.0, ” Exo can replicate many biological effects of their parent cells while avoiding risks such as immunogenicity, tumorigenicity, and engraftment failure (Rohde et al., 2019; Lai et al., 2022; Williams et al., 2022).”
InfluentialTotten, A. H., Adams, A. J., Halas, H. K., Gebo, J. E. T., East, A. D., & Lau, A. F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01498-22 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Chiu, Y.-S., Wu, K.-J., Yu, S.-J., Wu, K.-L., Hsieh, C.-Y., Chou, Y.-S., Chen, K.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., Bae, E.-K., Hung, T.-W., et al. (2024) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.1177/09636897241296366 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, J. J., Wang, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175704 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For CIK cells, characterization typically includes immunophenotyping for CD3 + T cell lineage, CD56 + NK-like subsets, and the CD3 + CD56 + NKT cell population, which mediates major cytotoxicity (Schmidt-Wolf et al., 1993; Linn et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2017).”
Probing mechanisms of cryopreservation damage to natural killer cells
Joules, A., Mallya, A. S., Louwagie, T., et al. (2025) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.01.012 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…are particularly signi fi cant for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), 2022), which are often administered shortly after culture or thawing and tend to be sensitive to cryopreservation (Meneghel et al., 2020; Joules et al., 2025).”
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Liao, C.-H., & Hsu, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91784-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mohammadi, M., Bauer, A., Roesti, D., & Anders, H.-J. (2023) · PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology · doi:10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…enable near real-time detection by capturing microorganisms on a membrane, staining with nucleic acid-binding fl uorophores, and enumerating them via laser scanning cytometry, reducing detection time to less than 3 h depending on bioburden levels (Smith et al., 2010; Mohammadi et al., 2023).”
Becherucci, V., Curini, L., Ceccantini, R., Bisin, S., Gori, V., Gentile, F., De Rienzo, E., Piccini, L., Bindi, B., Pavan, P., et al. (2021) · Biologicals · doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2021.07.006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Takimoto, R., Kamigaki, T., Ito, H., et al. (2023) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.06.007 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(CIK) cells (Schmeel et al., 2015), natural killer (NK) cells (Wu et al., 2020), dendritic cells (DCs) (Li et al., 2009), and gamma-delta ( γδ ) T cells (Arias-Badia et al., 2024), have demonstrated promising antitumor activity in cancer immunotherapy (Takimoto et al., 2023; Toner et al., 2024).”
Aseptic manufacturing of regenerative medicine products using isolator technology
Kokubo, M., & Akers, J. E. (2016) · Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy Through the Liver · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55666-4_13 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
(2015) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2023, Medicines EDftQo, healthcare. european pharmacopoeia
- Food, 1997, 21 CFR Part 11: electronic records; electronic signatures
- 1994, ISO 10648-2: containment enclosures — Part 2: classification according to leakage tightness and associated checking methods
- 2004, ISO 14644-7: cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 7: separative devices (clean air hoods, gloveboxes, isolators and mini-environments)
- 2007, PI 014-3: isolators used for aseptic processing and sterility testing
- 2022, PIC/S GMP Annex 1: manufacture of sterile medicinal products
- 2022, PIC/S GMP annex 2A: manufacture of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) for human Use
- 2023, PIC/S Guide to Good manufacturing practice for medicinal products (Part I)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rathore, A. S., Metya, S., Sharma, R., & Nitika, N. (2026) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2026.115812 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Zahid, A. A., Patel, M., & Paul, A. (2026) · Cell Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.celbio.2026.100444 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Bio-derived nanoplatforms: Emerging strategies for inflammatory bowel disease therapy
Qin, X., Deng, L., Wang, L., Ma, Y., Xiao, J., & Zhao, M. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.170958 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Liu, N., Tang, S., Yu, S., Song, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-026-04667-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Extracellular Vesicles and Plant-Derived Vesicles in Cancer: From Mechanisms to Clinical Translation
Jacob, S., Varkey, N. R., Boddu, S. H. S., et al. (2026) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18091098 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…compliant with ISO 14644-1-2015 [100], ISO-14644-2-2015 [101], ISO 14644-3:2019 [102], ISO 14644-4:2022 [103], and ISO 14644-5:2025 [104], supported by quality management systems aligned with ISO 13485 [105] and, where applicable, biological safety evaluation according to ISO 10993 [106].”
Abdullah, M., Abdulsahi, W. K., Mustafa, W. W., Jyothi, S. R., Nayak, P. P., Janney, J. B., Singh, G., Sinha, A., & Khamidov, O. (2026) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-026-11064-1
“Realizing this potential requires close collaboration among all stakeholders to standardize regulations, train personnel, and invest in the robust, automated infrastructure needed to deliver these advanced therapies safely [219].”
Ariwibowo, B., Widiaty, I., Fatra, F., Mahendra, S., & Rani, H. A. D. (2026) · International Journal of Training Research · doi:10.1080/14480220.2026.2630822
Habiba, U. E., Greene, D. L., & Shamim, S. (2026) · World Journal of Stem Cells · doi:10.4252/wjsc.v18.i4.118404
Genetically Unmodified Cells for Drug Delivery and Therapy
Zhang, B.-W., Chen, Y., Zhu, C.-J., Qiu, Q.-J., Gu, Z., & Li, H.-J. (2026) · ACS Nano Medicine · doi:10.1021/acsnanomed.6c00071
Translational Progress and Clinical Challenges in Bioengineered Bone and Joint Repair
Sunkara, A., McCloskey, C. P., Dias, D. A., Kalala, S., Peterson, J. T., Latshaw, M. J., Movva, A. K., & Anastasio, A. T. (2026) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines14061374
“Advances in automated and closed-system manufacturing platforms, including bioreactors and isolator-based systems, further demonstrate the potential to mitigate contamination risk, enhance consistency, and reduce production costs [165].”
Mesenchymal stem cells in breast cancer therapy: Mechanisms, applications, and clinical prospects
Qadir, S., Chandel, P., & Rather, M. A. (2026) · Ayush journal of integrative oncology. · doi:10.4103/ajio.ajio_9_26
Harnessing immunity against breast cancer: from checkpoints to cell therapies
Mussa, A., Hamid, M., Talib, M., Ismail, N. H., Lambuk, F., Bishir, A., Memon, M., Lukman, Y., Suliman, R., Yagoub, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08658-1
“This is especially problematic in decentralized, point-of-care models that aim to bring manufacturing closer to the patient [171, 172].”
Hariawan, B. S., Cahyani, D. M., Utomo, W. P., Farida, N., Rozafia, A. I., Purbowati, R., Miatmoko, A., & Hartanto, D. (2026) · Next Materials · doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103264
Fracture healing: from molecular and cellular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies
Staubli, F., ten Ham, R. M. T., Bergsma, J. E., Gawlitta, D., & Man, K. (2026) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-026-02967-z
“416 – 418 However, these approaches add technical complexity, training requirements, and implementation costs, leaving many cell-based and combination products labor-intensive, dif fi cult to standardize, and vulnerable to variability as scale increases.”
Garbo, S., Marocco, F., Zwergel, C., Tripodi, M., & Battistelli, C. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70896
Hassna, E., Muhammad, H., & Yan, T. (2026) · Bioprinting · doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2026.e00507
Extracellular vesicle–mediated strategies for cancer tissue normalisation
Raudenská, M., Balvan, J., Gumulec, J., & Masařík, M. (2026) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218909
- Authors
- Chiu, Y.-S., Wang, K.-L., & Wu, K.-L.
- Affiliations
- Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
- I-Shou University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chiu, Yu-Sung
- ORCID
- Chiu, Yu-Sung
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-09-03
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 1644318-1644318
- ISSN
- 2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12440961
- OpenAlex
- W4413961666
- Semantic Scholar
- b938d03e1dd2b4d0d42a8b82c3eac68f923b3f97
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Keywords
- point-of-care manufacturing, extracellular vesicle therapy, GMP compliance, distributed manufacturing, quality control, regulatory framework, contamination risk reduction, personalized medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review