The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis
Abstract
Background: Uncomplicated appendicitis may resolve spontaneously or require treatment with antibiotics or appendicectomy. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the outcome of a non-antibiotic management strategy with that of antibiotic therapy in uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods: Patients presenting to a university teaching hospital with CT-verified uncomplicated simple appendicitis (appendiceal diameter no larger than 11 mm and without any signs of perforation) were randomized to management with a no-antibiotic regimen with supportive care (intravenous fluids, analgesia and antipyretics as necessary) or a 4-day course of antibiotics with supportive care. The primary endpoint was rate of total treatment failure, defined as initial treatment failure within 1 month and recurrence of appendicitis during the follow-up period. Results: Some 245 patients were randomized within the trial, and followed up for a median of 19 months. The duration of hospital stay was shorter (mean 3·1 versus 3·7 days; P < 0·001) and the medical costs lower (€1181 versus 1348; P < 0·001) among those randomized to therapy without antibiotics. There was no difference in total treatment failure rate between the groups: 29 of 124 (23·4 per cent) in the no-antibiotic group and 25 of 121 (20·7 per cent) in the antibiotic group (P = 0·609). Eighteen patients (9 in each group) had initial treatment failure, 15 of whom underwent appendicectomy and three received additional antibiotics. Thirty-six patients (20 in the no-antibiotic group, 16 in the antibiotic group) experienced recurrence, of whom 30 underwent appendicectomy and six received further antibiotics. Conclusion: Treatment failure rates in patients presenting with CT-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis appeared similar among those receiving supportive care with either a no-antibiotic regimen or a 4-day course of antibiotics. Registration number: KCT0000124 (http://cris.nih.go.kr).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines
Di Saverio, S., Podda, M., De Simone, B., Ceresoli, M., Augustin, G., Gori, A., Boermeester, M., Sartelli, M., Coccolini, F., Tarasconi, A., et al. (2020) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3 · Cited by 1,446
Salminen, P., Tuominen, R., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Hurme, S., Mecklin, J.-P., Sand, J., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13201 · Cited by 494
Podda, M., Gerardi, C., Cillara, N., Fearnhead, N., Gomes, C. A., Birindelli, A., Mulliri, A., Davies, R. J., & Di Saverio, S. (2019) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003225 · Cited by 266
Appendiceal Endometriosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Allahqoli, L., Mazidimoradi, A., Momenimovahed, Z., Günther, V., Ackermann, J., Salehiniya, H., & Alkatout, I. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13111827 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, H. C., Kim, M. J., & Lee, B. H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-09-19
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1785-1790
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2756475099
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.