The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Short-term results support antibiotics as an alternative to surgery for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but long-term outcomes are not known. Objective: To determine the late recurrence rate of appendicitis after antibiotic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Five-year observational follow-up of patients in the Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing appendectomy with antibiotic therapy, in which 530 patients aged 18 to 60 years with computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were randomized to undergo an appendectomy (n = 273) or receive antibiotic therapy (n = 257). The initial trial was conducted from November 2009 to June 2012 in Finland; last follow-up was September 6, 2017. This current analysis focused on assessing the 5-year outcomes for the group of patients treated with antibiotics alone. Interventions: Open appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy with intravenous ertapenem for 3 days followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin and metronidazole. Main Outcomes and Measures: In this analysis, prespecified secondary end points reported at 5-year follow-up included late (after 1 year) appendicitis recurrence after antibiotic treatment, complications, length of hospital stay, and sick leave. Results: Of the 530 patients (201 women; 329 men) enrolled in the trial, 273 patients (median age, 35 years [IQR, 27-46]) were randomized to undergo appendectomy, and 257 (median age, 33 years, [IQR, 26-47]) were randomized to receive antibiotic therapy. In addition to 70 patients who initially received antibiotics but underwent appendectomy within the first year (27.3% [95% CI, 22.0%-33.2%]; 70/256), 30 additional antibiotic-treated patients (16.1% [95% CI, 11.2%-22.2%]; 30/186) underwent appendectomy between 1 and 5 years. The cumulative incidence of appendicitis recurrence was 34.0% (95% CI, 28.2%-40.1%; 87/256) at 2 years, 35.2% (95% CI, 29.3%-41.4%; 90/256) at 3 years, 37.1% (95% CI, 31.2%-43.3%; 95/256) at 4 years, and 39.1% (95% CI, 33.1%-45.3%; 100/256) at 5 years. Of the 85 patients in the antibiotic group who subsequently underwent appendectomy for recurrent appendicitis, 76 had uncomplicated appendicitis, 2 had complicated appendicitis, and 7 did not have appendicitis. At 5 years, the overall complication rate (surgical site infections, incisional hernias, abdominal pain, and obstructive symptoms) was 24.4% (95% CI, 19.2%-30.3%) (n = 60/246) in the appendectomy group and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.8%-10.4%) (n = 16/246) in antibiotic group (P < .001), which calculates to 17.9 percentage points (95% CI, 11.7-24.1) higher after surgery. There was no difference between groups for length of hospital stay, but there was a significant difference in sick leave (11 days more for the appendectomy group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who were initially treated with antibiotics for uncomplicated acute appendicitis, the likelihood of late recurrence within 5 years was 39.1%. This long-term follow-up supports the feasibility of antibiotic treatment alone as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01022567.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis
Jaschinski, T., Mosch, C. G., Eikermann, M., Neugebauer, E. A., & Sauerland, S. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub4 · Cited by 1,016
Salminen, P., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Tuominen, R., Hurme, S., Virtanen, J., Mecklin, J.-P., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6154 · Cited by 817
Self-citationLaparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis
Sauerland, S., Jaschinski, T., & Neugebauer, E. A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub3 · Cited by 689
Vons, C., Barry, C., Maitre, S., Pautrat, K., Leconte, M., Costaglioli, B., Karoui, M., Alves, A., Dousset, B., Valleur, P., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60410-8 · Cited by 669
Hansson, J., Körner, U., Khorram-Manesh, A., Solberg, A., & Lundholm, K. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6482 · Cited by 500
Di Saverio, S., Sibilio, A., Giorgini, E., Biscardi, A., Villani, S., Coccolini, F., Smerieri, N., Pisano, M., Ansaloni, L., Sartelli, M., et al. (2014) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000560 · Cited by 273
Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis
Sallinen, V, Akl, E. A., You, J. J., Agarwal, A., Shoucair, S., Vandvik, P. O., Agoritsas, T., Heels-Ansdell, D., Guyatt, G. H., & Tikkinen, K. A. O. (2016) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10147 · Cited by 261
Huang, L., Yin, Y., Yang, L., Wang, C., Li, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2017) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0057 · Cited by 230
Harnoss, J. C., Zelienka, I., Probst, P., Grummich, K., Müller-Lantzsch, C., Harnoss, J. M., Ulrich, A., Büchler, M. W., & Diener, M. K. (2017) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002039 · Cited by 184
Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis
Park, H. C., Kim, M. J., & Lee, B. H. (2017) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10660 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines
Di Saverio, S., Podda, M., De Simone, B., Ceresoli, M., Augustin, G., Gori, A., Boermeester, M., Sartelli, M., Coccolini, F., Tarasconi, A., et al. (2020) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3 · Cited by 1,446
A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis
Collaborative, T. C. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2014320 · Cited by 573
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review
Moris, D., Paulson, E. K., & Pappas, T. N. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.20502 · Cited by 363
Podda, M., Gerardi, C., Cillara, N., Fearnhead, N., Gomes, C. A., Birindelli, A., Mulliri, A., Davies, R. J., & Di Saverio, S. (2019) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003225 · Cited by 266
Singh, H., Koomson, A. S., Decker, K. M., Park, J., & Demers, A. A. (2020) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.32793 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Salminen, P., Tuominen, R., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Hurme, S., Mecklin, J.-P., Sand, J., Virtanen, J., Jartti, A., & Grönroos, J. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-09-25
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1259
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2894194385
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 59.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2018.13201
- The paper
- Salminen, P., Tuominen, R., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Hurme, S., Mecklin, J.-P., Sand, J., Virtanen, J., Jartti, A., & Grönroos, J. M. (2018). Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.