Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,663

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A classification of fistula-in-ano

Parks, A G, Gordon, P H, Hardcastle, J D·1976·Journal of British Surgery

Abstract

A classification of anal fistulas is presented, which is the result of an analysis of 400 cases treated over the past IS years, based on the pathogenesis of the disease and the normal muscular anatomy of the pelvic floor. Four main types were found but numerous variations of each occur, which are described. It is hoped that this will alert the surgeon to the various complex situations that he may encounter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.1800630102

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,663

Metadata

Authors
Parks, A. G., Gordon, P. H., & Hardcastle, J. D.
Venue
Journal of British Surgery
Published
1976-01-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2038536063
Cited by
1,663
References
0
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A classification of fistula-in-ano. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800630102
The paper
Parks, A. G., Gordon, P. H., & Hardcastle, J. D. (1976). A classification of fistula-in-ano. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800630102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.