The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Recommendations for Evaluation, Interpretation, and Utilization of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease
Abstract
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography have become routine small bowel imaging tests to evaluate patients with established or suspected Crohn’s disease, but the interpretation and use of these imaging modalities can vary widely. A shared understanding of imaging findings, nomenclature, and utilization will improve the utility of these imaging techniques to guide treatment options, as well as assess for treatment response and complications. Representatives from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Crohn’s Disease-Focused Panel, the Society of Pediatric Radiology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and other experts, systematically evaluated evidence for imaging findings associated with small bowel Crohn’s disease enteric inflammation and established recommendations for the evaluation, interpretation, and use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography in small bowel Crohn’s disease. This work makes recommendations for imaging findings that indicate small bowel Crohn’s disease, how inflammatory small bowel Crohn’s disease and its complications should be described, elucidates potential extra-enteric findings that may be seen at imaging, and recommends that cross-sectional enterography should be performed at diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and considered for small bowel Crohn’s disease monitoring paradigms. A useful morphologic construct describing how imaging findings evolve with disease progression and response is described, and standard impressions for radiologic reports that convey meaningful information to gastroenterologists and surgeons are presented. ©2018, RSNA, AGA Institute, and Society of Abdominal Radiology This article is being published jointly in Radiology and Gastroenterology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Silverberg, M. S., Satsangi, J., Ahmad, T., Arnott, I. D., Bernstein, C. N., Brant, S. R., Caprilli, R., Colombel, J.-F., Gasche, C., Geboes, K., et al. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1155/2005/269076 · Cited by 3,409
Self-citationWhat is ‘quality of evidence’ and why is it important to clinicians?
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be · Cited by 3,250
Going from evidence to recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Vist, G. E., Liberati, A., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae · Cited by 1,810
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Brozek, J., Glasziou, P., Jaeschke, R., Vist, G. E., Williams, J. W., Kunz, R., Craig, J., Montori, V. M., et al. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae · Cited by 1,782
A classification of fistula-in-ano
Parks, A. G., Gordon, P. H., & Hardcastle, J. D. (1976) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800630102 · Cited by 1,663
Levine, A., Griffiths, A., Markowitz, J., Wilson, D. C., Turner, D., Russell, R. K., Fell, J., Ruemmele, F. M., Walters, T., Sherlock, M., et al. (2011) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1002/ibd.21493 · Cited by 1,512
Long-Term Evolution of Disease Behavior of Crohn's Disease
Cosnes, J., Cattan, S., Blain, A., Beaugerie, L., Carbonnel, F., Parc, R., & Gendre, J.-P. (2002) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/00054725-200207000-00002 · Cited by 1,346
Mucosal Healing Predicts Sustained Clinical Remission in Patients With Early-Stage Crohn's Disease
Baert, F., Moortgat, L., Van Assche, G., Caenepeel, P., Vergauwe, P., De Vos, M., Stokkers, P., Hommes, D., Rutgeerts, P., Vermeire, S., et al. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.056 · Cited by 830
Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease
Rimola, J., Rodriguez, S., García-Bosch, O., Ordás, I., Ayala, E., Aceituno, M., Pellisé, M., Ayuso, C., Ricart, E., Donoso, L., et al. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.167957 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruining, D. H., Zimmermann, E. M., Loftus, E. V., Sandborn, W. J., Sauer, C. G., Strong, S. A., & Society of Abdominal Radiology Crohn’s Disease-Focused Panel
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 776-799
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2783961797
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Recommendations for Evaluation, Interpretation, and Utilization of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2018171737
- The paper
- Bruining, D. H., Zimmermann, E. M., Loftus, E. V., Sandborn, W. J., Sauer, C. G., Strong, S. A., & Society of Abdominal Radiology Crohn’s Disease-Focused Panel. (2018). Consensus Recommendations for Evaluation, Interpretation, and Utilization of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.