The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis
Abstract
Necrosectomy with postoperative continuous local lavage was performed in a prospective study involving 95 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. In the same period 567 patients with oedematous-interstitial pancreatitis were treated non-operatively with a hospital mortality rate of 0·7 per cent. In patients with necrotizing pancreatitis the median Ranson criteria score was 4·5 points; operation was required at a median of 7 days after the onset of symptoms because of non-response to conservative treatment. In all, 59 per cent of the patients (56 out of 95) developed extended intrapancreatic parenchymal necrosis, 70 per cent had ascites, and 66 per cent had intra- and extrapancreatic necrosis; 42 per cent of the patients had bacterial infection of the necrotic tissue. For lavage a median of 8l/24 h of fluid were instilled postoperatively for 25 days (median). The lavage fluid showed high levels of immunoreactive trypsin, phospholipase A2, and endotoxin in the early postoperative period. Hospital mortality rate was 8·4 per cent. Necrosectomy and continuous postoperative lavage can achieve high survival rates in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Postoperative local lavage allows the continuous non-operative evacuation of biologically active compounds and devitalized tissue, and avoids damage to remaining vital exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Better Model of Acute Pancreatitis for Evaluating Therapy
SCHMIDT, J., RATTNER, D. W., LEWANDROWSKI, K., COMPTON, C. C., MANDAVILLI, U., KNOEFEL, W. T., & WARSHAW, A. L. (1992) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199201000-00007 · Cited by 870
IAP Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis
Uhl, W. H., Warshaw, A. L., IMRIE, C. W., Bassi, C., McKay, C. J., Lankisch, P. G., Carter, R., Magno, E. D., Banks, P. A., Whitcomb, D. C., et al. (2002) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1159/000071269 · Cited by 773
Acute Pancreatitis: Bench to the Bedside
Pandol, S. J., Saluja, A. K., Imrie, C. W., & Banks, P. A. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.055 · Cited by 677
Dervenis, C., Johnson, C. D., Bassi, C., Bradley, E., Imrie, C. W., McMahon, M. J., & Modlin, I. (1999) · International journal of pancreatology · doi:10.1007/bf02925968 · Cited by 451
Interventional management of abdominal sepsis: when and how
Goor, H. V. (2002) · Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00423-002-0309-7 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Beger, H. G., Büchler, M., Bittner, R., Block, S., Nevalainen, T., & Roscher, R.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-03-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-212
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2091995287
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800750306
- The paper
- Beger, H. G., Büchler, M., Bittner, R., Block, S., Nevalainen, T., & Roscher, R. (1988). Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800750306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.