The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Abstract
This study investigated the relationships between length of residual anorectum, anorectal physiological function and clinical outcome after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Thirty-four patients were studied a median of 13 (range 4–100) months after anterior resection. They were compared with a control group often patients who had undergone sigmoid colectomy for carcinoma without rectal excision. Resting anal pressure was found to be lower after coloanal than after colorectal anastomosis, and the capacity of the (neo)rectum was less after coloanal than after colorectal anastomosis. The (neo)rectoanal inhibitory reflex was found to be present in each patient, but maximum anal pressure during this “sampling” reflex was significantly lower (P < 0.01) after coloanal than after colorectal anastomosis, and the volume required for maximal inhibition of the sphincter was also less (P < 0.01). At 1 year after operation, median bowel frequency was greater after coloanal (4 per day) than after colorectal (2 per day) anastomosis and the degree of urgency of defaecation was also greater (P < 0.01). Quality of life in terms of anorectal function after anterior resection is thus significantly influenced by the length of rectum that is left. This, in turn, influences the functional capacity of the neorectum and the degree of inhibition of the anal sphincter during the neorectoanal inhibitory reflex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
Heald, R. J., Husband, E. M., & Ryall, R. D. H. (1982) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691019 · Cited by 2,917
Cited by
Quality of life in colorectal cancer: Stoma vs. nonstoma patients
Sprangers, M. A. G., Taal, B. G., Aaronson, N. K., & te Velde, A. (1995) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02054222 · Cited by 454
Scott, N., Jackson, P., Al-Jaberi, T., Dixon, M. F., Quirke, P., & Finan, P. J. (1995) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800820808 · Cited by 335
Self-citationOutcome after rectum or sigmoid resection: A review for gynecologists
Ret Dávalos, M. L., De Cicco, C., D’Hoore, A., De Decker, B., & Koninckx, P. R. (2007) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.07.015 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, W. G., Holdsworth, P. J., Stephenson, B. M., Finan, P. J., & Johnston, D.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1082-1086
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2080695470
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800791032
- The paper
- Lewis, W. G., Holdsworth, P. J., Stephenson, B. M., Finan, P. J., & Johnston, D. (1992). Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800791032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.