The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Female fecundity before and after operation for familial adenomatous polyposis
Abstract
Background: Knowledge about the fertility of women suffering from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is scarce and inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to investigate the fecundity of women with FAP before and after operation, and to compare the findings with those of a general population database and women with ulcerative colitis. Methods: A questionnaire concerning reproductive experiences and waiting times to pregnancy was sent to all 230 women on the polyposis registers in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway in whom primary surgery had consisted of ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Data on the general population and women with ulcerative colitis came from an existing database. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier plots were used for analysis. Results: The fecundity of women with FAP before operation and after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was similar to that of the general population. However, fecundity dropped to 54 per cent (P = 0·015) following proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis, although it was greater than the postoperative fecundity of women with ulcerative colitis. Conclusion: The significant reduction in female fecundity after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis should be communicated to young women with FAP before it is decided which surgical option to follow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Magro, F., Gionchetti, P., Eliakim, R., Ardizzone, S., Armuzzi, A., Barreiro-de Acosta, M., Burisch, J., Gecse, K. B., Hart, A. L., Hindryckx, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008 · Cited by 1,910
Dignass, A., Lindsay, J. O., Sturm, A., Windsor, A., Colombel, J.-F., Allez, M., D'Haens, G., D'Hoore, A., Mantzaris, G., Novacek, G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002 · Cited by 1,548
Self-citationFamilial adenomatous polyposis
Galiatsatos, P., & Foulkes, W. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00375.x · Cited by 757
European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis
Øresland, T., Bemelman, W. A., Sampietro, G. M., Spinelli, A., Windsor, A., Ferrante, M., Marteau, P., Zmora, O., Kotze, P. G., Espin-Basany, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012 · Cited by 353
Self-citationBartels, S. A. L., D'Hoore, A., Cuesta, M. A., Bensdorp, A. J., Lucas, C., & Bemelman, W. A. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318250caa9 · Cited by 257
Risk of rectal cancer after colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis: a national cohort study
Abdalla, M., Landerholm, K., Andersson, P., Andersson, R. E., & Myrelid, P. (2017) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.036 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, K. Ø., Juul, S., Bülow, S., Järvinen, H. J., Bakka, A., Björk, J., Öresland, T., & Laurberg, S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-28
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-231
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1979601128
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.