Cited by 757Genetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Familial adenomatous polyposis

Galiatsatos, Polymnia, Foulkes, William D.·2006·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal-dominant colorectal cancer syndrome, caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, on chromosome 5q21. It is characterized by hundreds of adenomatous colorectal polyps, with an almost inevitable progression to colorectal cancer at an average age of 35 to 40 yr. Associated features include upper gastrointestinal tract polyps, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, desmoid tumors, and other extracolonic malignancies. Gardner syndrome is more of a historical subdivision of FAP, characterized by osteomas, dental anomalies, epidermal cysts, and soft tissue tumors. Other specified variants include Turcot syndrome (associated with central nervous system malignancies) and hereditary desmoid disease. Several genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed. Attenuated FAP is a phenotypically distinct entity, presenting with fewer than 100 adenomas. Multiple colorectal adenomas can also be caused by mutations in the human MutY homologue (MYH) gene, in an autosomal recessive condition referred to as MYH associated polyposis (MAP). Endoscopic screening of FAP probands and relatives is advocated as early as the ages of 10-12 yr, with the objective of reducing the occurrence of colorectal cancer. Colectomy remains the optimal prophylactic treatment, while the choice of procedure (subtotal vs proctocolectomy) is still controversial. Along with identifying better chemopreventive agents, op…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00375.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of heterozygosity of APC is one of the earliest and rate-limiting events in the progression from normal epithelium to adenoma formation and then cancer.

    “loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of APC has been shown to be one of the earliest and rate-limiting events in the progression from normal epithelium to adenoma formation and then cancer [3–5].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galiatsatos, P., & Foulkes, W. D.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Foulkes, William D.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-02
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
385-398
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2010174939
Cited by
757
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 46
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
familial adenomatous polyposis, APC gene, colorectal cancer, Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome, MYH-associated polyposis, MYH gene, genotype-phenotype correlation, colorectal adenoma, endoscopic screening, colectomy, subtotal colectomy, proctocolectomy, chemoprevention, extracolonic malignancies, aggressive fibromatosis
MeSH terms
Colonoscopy, Genotype, Humans, Mass Screening, Mutation, Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Global Health, Incidence, Genes, APC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review