The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer carries a dismal prognosis but there has been a vast increase in evidence on its management in the past decade. Methods: An electronic and manual search was performed for articles on the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer published in the past 10 years. Results: Six major areas of advancement were identified. Groups at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer, notably those with chronic pancreatitis and hereditary pancreatitis, have been defined, raising the need for secondary screening. Methods of staging pancreatic cancer for resection have greatly improved but accuracy is still only 85–90 per cent. Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy without extended lymphadenectomy is the simplest procedure; it does not compromise long-term survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival. Patients who are free from major co-morbidity have better palliation by surgery (with a double bypass) than by endoscopy. High-volume centres improve the results of surgery for all outcome measures including long-term survival. Conclusion: The surgical management of pancreatic cancer has undergone a significant change in the past decade. It has moved away from no active treatment. The standard of care can now be defined as potentially curative resection in a specialist centre followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma
Hahn, S. A., Greenhalf, B., Ellis, I., Sina-Frey, M., Rieder, H., Korte, B., Gerdes, B., Kress, R., Ziegler, A., Raeburn, J. A., et al. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.3.214 · Cited by 480
CDKN2A Germline Mutations in Familial Pancreatic Cancer
Bartsch, D. K., Sina-Frey, M., Lang, S., Wild, A., Gerdes, B., Barth, P., Kress, R., Grützmann, R., Colombo-Benkmann, M., Ziegler, A., et al. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200212000-00005 · Cited by 186
Lipton (1995) · Pure Amsterdam UMC · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19950415)75:8 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer
Verbeke, C. S., Leitch, D., Menon, K. V., McMahon, M. J., Guillou, P. J., & Anthoney, A. (2006) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5397 · Cited by 593
Smith, R. A., Bosonnet, L., Raraty, M., Sutton, R., Neoptolemos, J. P., Campbell, F., & Ghaneh, P. (2009) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.057 · Cited by 458
Self-citationYan, L., Tonack, S., Smith, R., Dodd, S., Jenkins, R. E., Kitteringham, N., Greenhalf, W., Ghaneh, P., Neoptolemos, J. P., & Costello, E. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800451h · Cited by 44
Self-citationKilian, M., Gregor, J. I., Heukamp, I., Hanel, M., Ahlgrimm, M., Schimke, I., Kristiansen, G., Ommer, A., Walz, M. K., Jacobi, C. A., et al. (2006) · Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids · doi:10.1016/j.plefa.2006.08.004 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexakis, N., Halloran, C., Raraty, M., Ghaneh, P., Sutton, R., & Neoptolemos, J. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-21
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1410-1427
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2126119745
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.4794
- The paper
- Alexakis, N., Halloran, C., Raraty, M., Ghaneh, P., Sutton, R., & Neoptolemos, J. P. (2004). Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.