The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: The impact of anastomotic leakage on immediate postoperative mortality in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer is well recognized. Its impact on long-term survival is less clear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between anastomotic leakage and long-term survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 2235 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in Scotland were included in the study. Five-year survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios were calculated. Results: Fourteen (16 per cent) of the 86 patients with an anastomotic leak died within 30 days of surgery compared with 83 (3·9 per cent) of 2149 without a leak. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate, including postoperative deaths, was 42 per cent in patients with an anastomotic leak compared with 66·9 per cent in those with no leak (P < 0·001). Excluding postoperative deaths, respective values were 50 and 68·0 per cent (P < 0·001). The adjusted relative hazard ratios, for patients with an anastomotic leak compared with those without a leak, and excluding 30-day mortality, were 1·61 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·19 to 2·16; P = 0·002) for overall survival and 1·99 (95 per cent c.i. 1·42 to 2·79; P < 0·001) for cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: Development of an anastomotic leak is associated with worse long-term survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Jafari, M. D., Lee, K. H., Halabi, W. J., Mills, S. D., Carmichael, J. C., Stamos, M. J., & Pigazzi, A. (2013) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2832-8 · Cited by 337
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Montedori, A., Cirocchi, R., Farinella, E., Sciannameo, F., & Abraha, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006878.pub2 · Cited by 246
Smoking is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing low anterior resection
Richards, C. H., Campbell, V., Ho, C., Hayes, J., Elliott, T., & Thompson‐Fawcett, M. (2012) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02718.x · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- McArdle, C. S., McMillan, D. C., & Hole, D. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-21
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1150-1154
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2044199111
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.5054
- The paper
- McArdle, C. S., McMillan, D. C., & Hole, D. J. (2005). Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.