The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary
Open accessAbstract
Background: In many patients with advanced synchronous liver metastases from colorectal tumours, the metastases progress during treatment of the primary, precluding curative treatment. The authors have investigated a management strategy that involves high-impact chemotherapy first, resection of liver metastases second and finally removal of the primary tumour in patients with adverse prognostic factors. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients with non-obstructive colonic (nine patients) or rectal (11 patients) cancer and advanced synchronous liver metastases were treated according to this strategy. Median age was 56 years. Patients received between two and six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Data were collected prospectively. Results: Overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after the start of treatment were 85, 79, 71 and 56 per cent respectively, with a median survival of 46 months. Sixteen of the 20 patients had complete removal of liver metastases and colorectal tumours (resectability rate 80 per cent). Conclusion: This new strategy produced resectability and survival rates better than those expected from the published data on patients with disease of similar severity. It allows initial control and downstaging of liver metastases, and delivery of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer without the fear that liver metastases will meanwhile progress beyond the possibility of cure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Sauer, R., Becker, H., Hohenberger, W., Rödel, C., Wittekind, C., Fietkau, R., Martus, P., Tschmelitsch, J., Hager, E., Hess, C. F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040694 · Cited by 6,050
Cited by
Adam, R., de Gramont, A., Figueras, J., Kokudo, N., Kunstlinger, F., Loyer, E., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Sobrero, A., et al. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006 · Cited by 607
Self-citationBrouquet, A., Mortenson, M. M., Vauthey, J.-N., Rodriguez-Bigas, M. A., Overman, M. J., Chang, G. J., Kopetz, S., Garrett, C., Curley, S. A., & Abdalla, E. K. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.039 · Cited by 273
Current Surgical Management Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Ivey, G. D., Johnston, F. M., Azad, N. S., Christenson, E. S., Lafaro, K. J., & Shubert, C. R. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14041063 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Mentha, G., Majno, P. E., Andres, A., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Morel, P., & Roth, A. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-02
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 872-878
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2075045697
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.