Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Swedish rectal cancer registry

Påhlman, L, Bohe, M, Cedermark, B, Dahlberg, M, Lindmark, G, Sjödahl, R, Öjerskog, B, Damber, L, Johansson, R·2007·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: An audit of all patients with rectal cancer in Sweden was launched in 1995. This is the first report from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR). Methods: Between 1995 and 2003, 13 434 patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the rectum were registered with the SRCR; there were approximately 1500 new patients annually. Results: Approximately half had an anterior resection, a quarter an abdominoperineal resection and 15 per cent a Hartmann's procedure. The median 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2·4 per cent and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 35·0 per cent. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 62·3 per cent. The 5-year relative survival rate was 70·1 per cent after anterior resection, 59·8 per cent after abdominoperineal resection and 39·8 per cent after a Hartmann's procedure. The crude 5-year local recurrence rate was 9·5 per cent overall, 6·1 per cent after preoperative radiotherapy and 11·4 per cent after surgery alone. For 3868 patients who had a locally curative procedure the local recurrence rate was 7·4 per cent overall, 5·9 per cent for those who had radiotherapy and 10·2 per cent for those who did not. The local recurrence rate was 2·9 per cent (28 of 968) for stage I disease, 7·9 per cent (112 of 1418) for stage II, 13·9 per cent (188 of 1357) for stage III and 8·5 per cent (45 of 532) for stage IV. Conclusion: These good population-based results are due, in part, to the nationwide prospective quality assurance registration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.5679

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Påhlman, L., Bohe, M., Cedermark, B., Dahlberg, M., Lindmark, G., Sjödahl, R., Öjerskog, B., Damber, L., & Johansson, R.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2007-07-27
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
1285-1292
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2111362587
Cited by
381
References
2
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Swedish rectal cancer registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.5679
The paper
Påhlman, L., Bohe, M., Cedermark, B., Dahlberg, M., Lindmark, G., Sjödahl, R., Öjerskog, B., Damber, L., & Johansson, R. (2007). The Swedish rectal cancer registry. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5679

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.