The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection
Abstract
Background: Accelerated recovery from surgery has been achieved when patients are managed within a multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. This study evaluated the benefit of an ERAS programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Methods: The ERAS protocol of epidural analgesia, early oral intake and early mobilization was studied prospectively in a consecutive series of 61 patients. Outcomes were compared with those in a consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent liver resection before the start of the study. Endpoints were postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative resumption of oral intake, readmissions, morbidity and mortality. Results: Fifty-six patients (92 per cent) in the ERAS group tolerated fluids within 4 h of surgery and a normal diet on day 1 after surgery. Median hospital stay, including readmissions, was 6·0 days compared with 8·0 days in the control group (P < 0·001). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission (13 and 10·0 per cent respectively), morbidity (41 and 31·0 per cent) and mortality (0 and 2·0 per cent) between ERAS and control groups. Conclusion: The ERAS fast-track protocol is safe and effective for patients undergoing liver resection. It allows early oral intake, promotes faster postoperative recovery and reduces hospital stay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, S. J., Egger, M., Sylvester, P. A., & Thomas, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773 · Cited by 858
Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications
Brady, M. C., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., & Ness, V. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004423 · Cited by 694
Interorgan amino acid exchange in humans: consequences for arginine and citrulline metabolism
van de Poll, M. C., Siroen, M. P., van Leeuwen, P. A., Soeters, P. B., Melis, G. C., Boelens, P. G., Deutz, N. E., & Dejong, C. H. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.1.167 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Temple-Oberle, C., Shea-Budgell, M. A., Tan, M., Semple, J. L., Schrag, C., Barreto, M., Blondeel, P., Hamming, J., Dayan, J., & Ljungqvist, O. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003242 · Cited by 361
Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection
Jones, C., Kelliher, L., Dickinson, M., Riga, A., Worthington, T., Scott, M. J., Vandrevala, T., Fry, C. H., Karanjia, N., & Quiney, N. (2013) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9165 · Cited by 266
Richards, H. S., Blazeby, J. M., Portal, A., Harding, R., Reed, T., Lander, T., Chalmers, K. A., Carter, R., Singhal, R., Absolom, K., et al. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07027-5 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- van Dam, R. M., Hendry, P. O., Coolsen, M. M. E., Bemelmans, M. H. A., Lassen, K., Revhaug, A., Fearon, K. C. H., Garden, O. J., & Dejong, C. H. C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 969-975
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1977829624
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.