The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the outcome of liver surgery for colorectal metastases (CLM) in patients over 70 years old in a large international multicentre cohort. Methods: Among 7764 patients who had resection of CLM, 999 (12·9 per cent) were aged 70–75 years, 468 (6·0 per cent) were aged 75–80 years and 157 (2·0 per cent) were at least 80 years old. Elderly patients were compared with the younger population. Results: Multinodular and bilateral metastases were less common in elderly than in younger patients (P < 0·001). Preoperative chemotherapy was used less frequently and more limited surgery was performed (P < 0·001). Sixty-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3·8 and 32·3 per cent respectively, compared with 1·6 and 28·7 per cent in younger patients (both P < 0·001). Three-year overall survival was 57·1 per cent in elderly and 60·2 per cent in younger patients (P < 0·001), and was similar among patients aged 70–75, 75–80 or at least 80 years (57·8, 55·3 and 54·1 per cent respectively; P = 0·160). Independent predictors of survival were more than three metastases, bilateral metastases, concomitant extrahepatic disease and no postoperative chemotherapy. Conclusion: Liver resection for CLM in elderly patients can achieve a reasonable 3-year survival rate, with an acceptable morbidity rate. There should be no upper age limit but risk factors may help predict potential benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tournigand, C., André, T., Achille, E., Lledo, G., Flesh, M., Mery-Mignard, D., Quinaux, E., Couteau, C., Buyse, M., Ganem, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.05.113 · Cited by 2,915
Cunningham, D., Pyrhönen, S., James, R. D., Punt, C. J., Hickish, T. F., Heikkila, R., Johannesen, T. B., Starkhammar, H., Topham, C. A., Awad, L., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)02309-5 · Cited by 1,259
Cited by
Taylor, A., Primrose, Langeberg, W., Kelsh, Mowat, F., Alexander, D., Choti, M., Poston, G., & Kanas, G. (2012) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s34285 · Cited by 657
Self-citationAdam, R., de Gramont, A., Figueras, J., Kokudo, N., Kunstlinger, F., Loyer, E., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Sobrero, A., et al. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006 · Cited by 607
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adam, R., Frilling, A., Elias, D., Laurent, C., Ramos, E., Capussotti, L., Poston, G. J., Wicherts, D. A., & de Haas, R. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01-25
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 366-376
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2125424844
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.6889
- The paper
- Adam, R., Frilling, A., Elias, D., Laurent, C., Ramos, E., Capussotti, L., Poston, G. J., Wicherts, D. A., & de Haas, R. J. (2010). Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.