The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis13
Open accessAbstract
Background: The standard of care for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis today is antibiotic treatment, although there are no controlled studies supporting this management. The aim was to investigate the need for antibiotic treatment in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, with the endpoint of recovery without complications after 12 months of follow-up. Methods: This multicentre randomized trial involving ten surgical departments in Sweden and one in Iceland recruited 623 patients with computed tomography-verified acute uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomized to treatment with (314 patients) or without (309 patients) antibiotics. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, co-morbidities, body temperature, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level on admission were similar in the two groups. Complications such as perforation or abscess formation were found in six patients (1·9 per cent) who received no antibiotics and in three (1·0 per cent) who were treated with antibiotics (P = 0·302). The median hospital stay was 3 days in both groups. Recurrent diverticulitis necessitating readmission to hospital at the 1-year follow-up was similar in the two groups (16 per cent, P = 0·881). Conclusion: Antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis neither accelerates recovery nor prevents complications or recurrence. It should be reserved for the treatment of complicated diverticulitis. Registration number: NCT01008488 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection
Mazuski, J. E., Tessier, J. M., May, A. K., Sawyer, R. G., Nadler, E. P., Rosengart, M. R., Chang, P. K., O'Neill, P. J., Mollen, K. P., Huston, J. M., et al. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2016.261 · Cited by 573
Sartelli, M., Chichom-Mefire, A., Labricciosa, F. M., Hardcastle, T., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Adesunkanmi, A. K., Ansaloni, L., Bala, M., Balogh, Z. J., Beltrán, M. A., et al. (2017) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6 · Cited by 494
Hall, J., Hardiman, K., Lee, S., Lightner, A., Stocchi, L., Paquette, I. M., Steele, S. R., Feingold, D. L., & Prepared on behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2020) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000001679 · Cited by 485
WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections
Sartelli, M., Coccolini, F., Kluger, Y., Agastra, E., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Abbas, A. E. S., Ansaloni, L., Adesunkanmi, A. K., Atanasov, B., Augustin, G., et al. (2021) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- for the AVOD Study Group, Chabok, A., Påhlman, L., Hjern, F., Haapaniemi, S., & Smedh, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-30
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-539
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2082693656
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis13. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.8688
- The paper
- for the AVOD Study Group, Chabok, A., Påhlman, L., Hjern, F., Haapaniemi, S., & Smedh, K. (2012). Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis13. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8688
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.