Cited by 73Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryNutrition and Health in Aging

Nutritional screening for risk prediction in patients scheduled for abdominal operations

Kuppinger, D, Hartl, W H, Bertok, M, Hoffmann, J M, Cederbaum, J, Küchenhoff, H, Jauch, K-W, Rittler, P·2012·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background Increased risks related to surgery might reflect the nutritional status of some patients. Such a group might benefit from perioperative nutritional support. The purpose of this study was to identify the relative importance of nutritional risk screening along with established medical, anaesthetic and surgical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Methods This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive eligible patients scheduled for elective abdominal operations. Data were collected on nutritional variables (body mass index, weight loss, food intake), age, sex, type and extent of operation, underlying disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and co-morbidities. A modified composite nutritional screening tool (Nutritional Risk Screening, NRS 2002) currently recommended by European guidelines was used. Relative complication rates were calculated with multiple logistic regression and cumulative proportional odds models. Results Some 653 patients were enrolled of whom 132 (20.2 per cent) sustained one or more postoperative complications. The frequency of this event increased significantly with a lower food intake before hospital admission. No other individual or composite nutritional variable provided comparable or better risk prediction (including NRS 2002). Other factors significantly associated with severe postoperative complications were ASA grade, male sex, underlying disease, extent of surgical procedure and volume of transfuse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.8710

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Malnutrition affects 30-50% of adult patients admitted to hospitals.

    “Malnutrition affects 30–50% of adult patients admitted to hospitals [233, 234].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [234]

  • Hospital stay is a risk factor for malnutrition.

    “and malnutrition [112, 233, 234].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [234]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuppinger, D., Hartl, W. H., Bertok, M., Hoffmann, J. M., Cederbaum, J., Küchenhoff, H., Jauch, K.-W., & Rittler, P.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Hartl, W H
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2012-02-24
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
728-737
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2047183249
Cited by
73
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
nutritional risk screening, NRS-2002, postoperative complications, abdominal surgery, preoperative nutritional assessment, risk prediction, ASA physical status, red blood cell transfusion, elective surgery
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Aged, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Disorders, Nutritional Status, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Weight Loss, Elective Surgical Procedures, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review