The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants
Abstract
Background: It has been hypothesized that bacterial biofilms on breast implants may cause chronic inflammation leading to capsular contracture. The association between bacterial biofilms of removed implants and capsular contracture was investigated. Methods: Breast implants explanted between 2006 and 2010 at five participating centres for plastic and reconstructive surgery were investigated by sonication. Bacterial cultures derived from sonication were correlated with patient, surgical and implant characteristics, and the degree of capsular contracture. Results: The study included 121 breast implants from 84 patients, of which 119 originated from women and two from men undergoing gender reassignment. Some 50 breast prostheses were implanted for reconstruction, 48 for aesthetic reasons and 23 implants were used as temporary expander devices. The median indwelling time was 4·0 (range 0·1–32) years for permanent implants and 3 (range 1–6) months for temporary devices. Excluding nine implants with clinical signs of infection, sonication cultures were positive in 40 (45 per cent) of 89 permanent implants and in 12 (52 per cent) of 23 temporary devices. Analysis of permanent implants showed that a positive bacterial culture after sonication correlated with the degree of capsular contracture: Baker I, two of 11 implants; Baker II, two of ten; Baker III, nine of 23; and Baker IV, 27 of 45 (P < 0·001). The most frequent organisms were Propionibacterium acnes (25 implants) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (21). Conclusion: Sonication cultures correlated with the degree of capsular contracture, indicating the potential causative role of bacterial biofilms in the pathogenesis of capsular contracture. Registration number: NCT01138891 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections
Wu, H., Moser, C., Wang, H.-Z., Høiby, N., & Song, Z.-J. (2015) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/ijos.2014.65 · Cited by 925
ESCMID∗ guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Moser, C., Bassi, G. L., Coenye, T., Donelli, G., Hall-Stoodley, L., Holá, V., Imbert, C., Kirketerp-Møller, K., et al. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024 · Cited by 726
Loch-Wilkinson, A., Beath, K. J., Knight, R. J. W., Wessels, W. L. F., Magnusson, M., Papadopoulos, T., Connell, T., Lofts, J., Locke, M., Hopper, I., et al. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003654 · Cited by 373
Cutibacterium acnes as an Opportunistic Pathogen: An Update of Its Virulence-Associated Factors
Mayslich, C., Grange, P. A., & Dupin, N. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020303 · Cited by 304
Stevens, W. G., Nahabedian, M. Y., Calobrace, M. B., Harrington, J. L., Capizzi, P. J., Cohen, R., d’Incelli, R. C., & Beckstrand, M. (2013) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Rieger, U. M., Mesina, J., Kalbermatten, D. F., Haug, M., Frey, H. P., Pico, R., Frei, R., Pierer, G., Lüscher, N. J., & Trampuz, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-06
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 768-774
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2107584552
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9084
- The paper
- Rieger, U. M., Mesina, J., Kalbermatten, D. F., Haug, M., Frey, H. P., Pico, R., Frei, R., Pierer, G., Lüscher, N. J., & Trampuz, A. (2013). Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.