Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer

Sloothaak, D A M, Geijsen, D E, van Leersum, N J, Punt, C J A, Buskens, C J, Bemelman, W A, Tanis, P J·2013·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been proven to increase local control in rectal cancer, but the optimal interval between CRT and surgery is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of variations in clinical practice regarding timing of surgery on pathological response at a population level. Methods: All evaluable patients who underwent preoperative CRT for rectal cancer between 2009 and 2011 were selected from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. The interval between radiotherapy and surgery was calculated from the start of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; pathological status after chemoradiotherapy (yp) T0 N0). Results: A total of 1593 patients were included. The median interval between radiotherapy and surgery was 14 (range 6–85, interquartile range 12–16) weeks. Outcome measures were calculated for intervals of less than 13 weeks (312 patients), 13–14 weeks (511 patients), 15–16 weeks (406 patients) and more than 16 weeks (364 patients). Age, tumour location and R0 resection rate were distributed equally between the four groups; significant differences were found for clinical tumour category (cT4: 17·3, 18·4, 24·5 and 26·6 per cent respectively; P = 0·010) and clinical metastasis category (cM1: 4·4, 4·8, 8·9 and 14·9 per cent respectively; P < 0·001). Resection 15–16 weeks after the start of CRT resulted in the highest pCR rate (18·0 per cent; P = 0·013), with an independent association (hazard ratio 1·63, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·20 to 2·23). Results for secondary endpoints in the group with an interval of 15–16 weeks were: tumour downstaging, 55·2 per cent (P = 0·165); nodal downstaging, 58·6 per cent (P = 0·036); and (near)-complete response, 23·2 per cent (P = 0·124). Conclusion: Delaying surgery until the 15th or 16th week after the start of CRT (10–11 weeks from the end of CRT) seemed to result in the highest chance of a pCR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.9112

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Sloothaak, D. A. M., Geijsen, D. E., van Leersum, N. J., Punt, C. J. A., Buskens, C. J., Bemelman, W. A., & Tanis, P. J.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
933-939
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W1826055758
Cited by
290
References
20
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9112
The paper
Sloothaak, D. A. M., Geijsen, D. E., van Leersum, N. J., Punt, C. J. A., Buskens, C. J., Bemelman, W. A., & Tanis, P. J. (2013). Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.