The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed by clinical examination, consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE) and endoscopy, and by MRI. A high accuracy is required to select complete response (CR) for organ-preserving treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical examination (endoscopy with or without biopsy and DRE), T2W-MRI, and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for the detection of CR after CRT. METHODS: This prospective cohort study in a university hospital recruited 50 patients who underwent clinical assessment (DRE, endoscopy with or without biopsy), T2W-MRI, and DWI at 6-8 weeks after CRT. Confidence levels were used to score the likelihood of CR. The reference standard was histopathology or recurrence-free interval of >12 months in cases of wait-and-see approaches. Diagnostic performance was calculated by area under the receiver operator characteristics curve, with corresponding sensitivities and specificities. Strategies were assessed and compared by use of likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Seventeen (34 %) of 50 patients had a CR. Areas under the curve were 0.88 (0.78-1.00) for clinical assessment and 0.79 (0.66-0.92) for T2W-MRI and DWI. Combining the modalities led to a posttest probability for predicting a CR of 98 %. Conversely, when all modalities indicated residual tumor, 15 % of patients still experienced CR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment after CRT is the single most accurate modality for identification of CR after CRT. Addition of MRI with DWI further improves the diagnostic performance, and the combination can be recommended as the optimal strategy for a safe and accurate selection of CR after CRT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708 · Cited by 7,016
Maas, M., Nelemans, P. J., Valentini, V., Das, P., Rödel, C., Kuo, L.-J., Calvo, F. A., García-Aguilar, J., Glynne-Jones, R., Haustermans, K., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70172-8 · Cited by 1,945
Self-citationHabr-Gama, A., Perez, R. O., Nadalin, W., Sabbaga, J., Ribeiro, U., Silva e Sousa, A. H., Campos, F. G., Kiss, D. R., & Gama-Rodrigues, J. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32 · Cited by 1,893
(2012) · Hepatogastroenterology · doi:10.5754/hge12404 · Cited by 1,825
Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios
Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168 · Cited by 1,600
Wait-and-See Policy for Clinical Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer
Maas, M., Beets-Tan, R. G. H., Lambregts, D. M. J., Lammering, G., Nelemans, P. J., Engelen, S. M. E., van Dam, R. M., Jansen, R. L. H., Sosef, M., Leijtens, J. W. A., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.37.7176 · Cited by 1,117
Self-citationBeets-Tan, R. G. H., Lambregts, D. M. J., Maas, M., Bipat, S., Barbaro, B., Curvo-Semedo, L., Fenlon, H. M., Gollub, M. J., Gourtsoyianni, S., Halligan, S., et al. (2018) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 · Cited by 1,063
Self-citationHabr-Gama, A., Gama-Rodrigues, J., São Julião, G. P., Proscurshim, I., Sabbagh, C., Lynn, P. B., & Perez, R. O. (2014) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.012 · Cited by 603
Habr-Gama, A., Perez, R. O., Wynn, G., Marks, J., Kessler, H., & Gama-Rodrigues, J. (2010) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181f42b89 · Cited by 454
Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy
Smith, J. D., Ruby, J. A., Goodman, K. A., Saltz, L. B., Guillem, J. G., Weiser, M. R., Temple, L. K., Nash, G. M., & Paty, P. B. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182759f1c · Cited by 418
Cited by
The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer
Keller, D. S., Berho, M., Perez, R. O., Wexner, S. D., & Chand, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Maas, M., Lambregts, D. M. J., Nelemans, P. J., Heijnen, L. A., Martens, M. H., Leijtens, J. W. A., Sosef, M., Hulsewé, K. W. E., Hoff, C., Breukink, S. O., Stassen, L., Beets-Tan, R. G. H., & Beets, G. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-07-22
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3873-3880
- ISSN
- 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1764231357
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9
- The paper
- Maas, M., Lambregts, D. M. J., Nelemans, P. J., Heijnen, L. A., Martens, M. H., Leijtens, J. W. A., Sosef, M., Hulsewé, K. W. E., Hoff, C., Breukink, S. O., Stassen, L., Beets-Tan, R. G. H., & Beets, G. L. (2015). Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment. Annals of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.