The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical blood loss
Open accessAbstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood transfusion in surgery but the extent of the reduction in blood loss and how it relates to the dose of TXA is unclear. Methods: A systematic review of randomized trials was performed. Data were extracted on blood loss from trials comparing intravenous TXA with no TXA or placebo in surgical patients. A Bayesian linear regression was used to describe the relationship between the reduction in blood loss with TXA and the extent of bleeding as measured by the mean blood loss in the control group. A meta-analysis of the log-transformed data was conducted to quantify the effect of TXA on blood loss, stratified by type of surgery, timing of TXA administration and trial quality. Meta-regression was used to explore the effect of TXA dosage. Results: Data from 104 trials were examined. Although the absolute reduction in blood loss with TXA increased as surgical bleeding increased, the percentage reduction was similar. TXA reduced blood loss by 34 per cent (pooled ratio 0·66, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·65 to 0·67; P < 0·001). The percentage reduction in blood loss with TXA differed by type of surgery, timing of TXA administration and trial quality, but the differences were small. The effect of TXA on blood loss did not vary over the range of doses assessed (5·5–300 mg/kg). Conclusion: TXA reduces blood loss in surgical patients by about one-third. A total dose of 1 g appears to be sufficient for most adults. There is no evidence to support the use of high doses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goobie, S. M., Meier, P. M., Pereira, L. M., McGowan, F. X., Prescilla, R. P., Scharp, L. A., Rogers, G. F., Proctor, M. R., Meara, J. G., Soriano, S. G., et al. (2011) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318210fd8f · Cited by 313 · cited 1×
“One hundred and four randomised comparisons described in 90 articles, reported data on blood loss in a format suitable for this analysis([4-93]).”
Background
Cited by
Guidelines on transfusion for fetuses, neonates and older children
New, H. V., Berryman, J., Bolton‐Maggs, P. H. B., Cantwell, C., Chalmers, E. A., Davies, T., Gottstein, R., Kelleher, A., Kumar, S., Morley, S. L., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14233 · Cited by 359
Ker, K., Shakur, H., & Roberts, I. (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14267 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ker, K., Prieto-Merino, D., & Roberts, I.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1271-1279
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1563786598
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical blood loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9193
- The paper
- Ker, K., Prieto-Merino, D., & Roberts, I. (2013). Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical blood loss. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.