Cited by 48Biosensors and Analytical DetectionAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Advances in nanoprobes‐based immunoassays

Open access

Abstract

Immunoassay is a powerful technique that uses highly specific antigen‐antibody interactions to detect biochemical targets such as proteins and toxins. As a diagnostic tool, immunoassay is employed in the screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of diseases, which are crucial for the grasp and control of patient conditions in clinical practice. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, immunoassays based on nanoprobes have attracted more and more attention due to the advantages of high sensitivity, specificity, stability, and versatility. These nanoprobes are nanoscale particles that can act as signal carriers or targeting agents for immunoassays. In this paper, we review the recent advances in various types of nanoprobes for immunoassays, such as colloidal gold, quantum dots, magnetic nanoparticles, nanozymes, aggregation‐induced emission, and up‐conversion nanoparticles. The effect of the nanoprobe construction and synthesis methods on their detection performance deserves to be studied in depth. We also compare their detection ranges and limits in different immunoassay methods, such as lateral flow immunoassays, fluorescent immunoassays, and surface‐enhanced Raman scattering immunoassays. Moreover, we discuss the benefits and challenges of nanoprobes in immunoassays and provide insights into their future development. This study aims to offer a comprehensive and critical perspective on the role of nanoprobes in the field of immunoassays.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bmm2.12057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Application of nanomaterials is hindered by non-specific cytotoxicity and suboptimal biocompatibility, which can trigger adverse immune responses.

    “Non-specific cytotoxicity, arising from unintended interactions with non-target cells, and suboptimal biocompatibility, which can trigger adverse immune responses, are among the primary concerns [53, 228].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 108

  1. Ukhurebor K. E., 2022, BioMed Res. Int., 1
  2. 10.1038/s41423-020-00530-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00027 · DOI
  4. 10.1063/10.0006524 · DOI
  5. Capek I., 2019, Nanocomposite Structures and Dispersions
  6. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111644 · DOI
  7. 10.1039/D1TB02521J · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120430 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00216-020-02422-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1039/D1NR01415C · DOI
  11. 10.1166/jnn.2018.16020 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/adma.202211210 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/toxins15010079 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340869 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135081 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341058 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132427 · DOI
  18. 10.1039/C8SC02752H · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04836 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10095 · DOI
  22. 10.1039/C1CS15166E · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.07.034 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jp072969g · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04518 · DOI
  26. 10.1039/c0cc04612d · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.013 · DOI
  28. 10.1039/D0AN00629G · DOI
  29. 10.3390/bios12010013 · DOI
  30. 10.1039/D0TB01509A · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101396 · DOI
  32. 10.2147/IJN.S281594 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130021 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.025 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02557 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121069 · DOI
  37. 10.1039/C5LC01249J · DOI
  38. 10.1021/bi0118512 · DOI
  39. Chen J., 2009, J. Biomed. Opt., 11, 3
  40. 10.1039/c1an15497d · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122242 · DOI
  42. 10.1039/C4CS00532E · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.09.011 · DOI
  44. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.795232 · DOI
  45. 10.1039/C9AN01753D · DOI
  46. 10.1186/s12989-018-0279-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/cbic.201800438 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/VIW.20200125 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.12.031 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339998 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/nano12010033 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113892 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s12274-022-5043-6 · DOI
  54. 10.3390/nano11030768 · DOI
  55. 10.3389/fchem.2020.626243 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/s00604-019-3917-4 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s00604-020-4125-y · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s00604-021-04890-2 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123575 · DOI
  60. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00170 · DOI
  61. 10.1039/C9AN00636B · DOI
  62. 10.1039/D2AN00522K · DOI
  63. 10.3390/bios13030366 · DOI
  64. Chen Y., 2020, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12
  65. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02284 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s00216-019-01909-9 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/s00604-019-3232-0 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s00604-019-3431-8 · DOI
  69. 10.1186/s11671-020-3247-9 · DOI
  70. 10.1021/acsanm.7b00025 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s00604-019-3726-9 · DOI
  72. 10.1039/C6TB02696F · DOI
  73. 10.1039/c3cs35486e · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1039/C9DT03743H · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112610 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113317 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135897 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111345 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.027 · DOI
  80. 10.1039/D0AN00417K · DOI
  81. 10.1039/C9TB01492F · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124229 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124134 · DOI
  84. 10.1039/b105159h · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1007/s00604-022-05616-8 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121694 · DOI
  87. 10.1021/acsnano.1c01932 · DOI
  88. Zhang J., 2022, Sci. Adv., 8, 12
  89. 10.3390/toxins15020113 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114411 · DOI
  91. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1042926 · DOI
  92. 10.1021/acssensors.1c02237 · DOI
  93. 10.1021/acsnano.8b05270 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121963 · DOI
  95. 10.1021/acsnano.1c08036 · DOI
  96. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02790 · DOI
  97. 10.1007/s00604-020-04349-w · DOI
  98. 10.1039/D2AN00742H · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.04.047 · DOI
  100. 10.1021/acsnano.0c05700 · DOI
  101. 10.1021/ac8023922 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115339 · DOI
  103. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00251 · DOI
  104. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111921 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.11.003 · DOI
  106. 10.1002/anie.201913924 · DOI
  107. 10.1021/acsnano.1c05267 · DOI
  108. 10.1186/s12951-017-0328-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., Huang, B., Jin, J., Li, Y., & Gu, N.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • Nanjing RealMind Biotech Co., Ltd. Nanjing Economic and Technological Development Zone Nanjing China
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Bin
  • Jin, Jing
  • Gu, Ning
Venue
BMEMat
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-14
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2751-7446 (ISSN-L)
  • 2751-7438
OpenAlex
W4387639007
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMEMat (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51832001, 61821002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20222002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
nanoprobes, immunoassay, colloidal gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, magnetic nanoparticles, nanozymes, aggregation-induced emission, upconversion nanoparticles, lateral flow immunoassay, fluorescence immunoassay, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, detection sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review