The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going
Open accessAbstract
Green product innovation (GPI) is becoming more and more relevant for policy makers, companies and society as a whole. As a result, over the last few years the number of studies on GPI development has increased substantially, thus prompting the need to analyse and synthesize the results of these studies. With this aim, this study reviews the body of knowledge on the topic. In particular, a systematic review of the literature is conducted, guided by three main research questions. Specifically, this paper identifies the antecedents, the outcomes and the success factors for GPI development. 63 studies are included in the review. Results show that many factors drive the development of GPI, both internal and external to the firm. Among internal factors, the most important are the prospect of competitive advantage, cost reduction, market benefits, improved reputation and opportunities for innovation. Among external factors, the most important are environmental regulations – current and/or expected – and market demand. In terms of outcomes, this study provides evidence that the most relevant ones are cost savings, achievement of competitive advantage, increased market share, increased sales, increased turnover, higher profits, better reputation, increased exports and higher productivity. Finally, this study highlights that many factors can influence the successful development of GPI, such as top management commitment, building networks of collaborations as well as enhancing knowledge flows, both within and outside the firm, cross‐functional integration and development of resources and capabilities. This study provides important implications for companies, policy makers and scholars. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2013) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2013.6601104 · Cited by 1,799
Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources
Horbach, J. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 1,777
Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)91637-7 · Cited by 1,751
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,723
Cited by
Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010 · Cited by 1,370
Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184 · Cited by 914
Self-citationKhanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2961 · Cited by 527
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2298 · Cited by 485
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Dangelico, R. M.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 560-576
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2096483068
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 58.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.1886
- The paper
- Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.