The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method
Abstract
Abstract Green technology innovation has received continuous attention from the business sector in recent years, yet few studies have examined the internal mechanisms and contingent conditions that link green technology innovation to a firm's financial performance. Using data from 209 listed companies that belong to heavily polluting manufacturing industries, collected via the content analysis method, we find that green process innovation has a positive impact on green product innovation, and that both green process innovation and green product innovation can improve a firm's financial performance. We also find that green product innovation mediates the relationship between green process innovation and a firm's financial performance, and that a firm's green image moderates the relationship between green product innovation and financial performance. However, our study shows that the moderating effect of green subsidies on the relationship between green product innovation and a firm's financial performance is not supported. Based on these findings, we provide several recommendations for managers and government entities to effectively implement green technology innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Cited by
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0624 · Cited by 681
Peng, H., Shen, N., Ying, H., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044 · Cited by 412
Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030 · Cited by 321
Badghish, S., & Soomro, Y. A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16051864 · Cited by 261
Yin, S., Zhang, N., Ullah, K., & Gao, S. (2022) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems10030072 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 697-706
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908546259
- Cited by
- 1,370
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 127.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
- The paper
- Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
