The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the associations and causations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions, utilizing a large, longitudinal, multicountry dataset disaggregated between developed and developing countries. The methodology uses a simultaneous equation model with system estimation to deal with endogeneity between the variables, and Granger causality tests to indicate their direction of causation. A robust result is that lower emissions are strongly associated with better economic performance. After pretesting for stationarity, we find evidence of a one‐way causation from emissions and environmental disclosure to economic performance, but no evidence of reverse causation. We also find strong evidence of a one‐way causation from emissions to disclosure, but no evidence of reverse causation. The overarching policy implication is that environmental performance, as measured by greenhouse gas emissions, plays a crucial role in the formulation of business strategy at the firm level and government environmental policy at national and international levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3 · Cited by 3,481
The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 · Cited by 2,069
Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50629 · Cited by 1,681
Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 · Cited by 1,031 · cited 5×
“…and significant in the full and developing country samples, consistent with results from Freedman and Patten (2004), Clarkson et al. (2013), and Plumlee et al. (2015), but negative and significant for developed countries, implying that greater prior environmental disclosure is associated with…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDifference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure
Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. S. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2127 · Cited by 713
The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative?
Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Gerged, A. M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2642 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassan, O. A. G., & Romilly, P.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02-13
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 893-909
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2776887966
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.