Cited by 3,570Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis

Open access
Clarkson, Peter M., Li, Yue, Richardson, Gordon D., Vasvari, Florin P.·2008·Accounting, Organizations and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical evidence on the link between CSR reporting and performance is decidedly mixed.

    “Not surprisingly in light of these conflicting predictions, the empirical evidence on the link between CSR reporting and performance is decidedly mixed (see also Section 4.1).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Clarkson et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Gordon D.
Venue
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
33
Issue
4-5
Pages
303-327
ISSN
0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121777248
Cited by
3,570
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 476 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 331 · 2023: 306 · 2022: 291 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 249 · 2019: 180 · 2018: 182 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 133 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 98
FWCI
94.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Keywords
environmental performance, environmental disclosure, discretionary disclosure, voluntary disclosure, legitimation, Global Reporting Initiative, sustainability reporting, corporate social responsibility reports, polluting industries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review