The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning
Abstract
With increase in the focus on environmental protection, firms are integrating sustainability issues in process and product innovations. Firms can contribute toward sustainability and also improve operational performance through green innovation practices. However, the adoption of green innovation practices depends on the proactivity of top managers toward environment management. In this paper, we study the relationships between proactive environment strategy, green process innovation (GPRI), and operational performance. Further, we examine the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities (DCs) (technological capabilities and organizational learning) between GPRI and operational performance. The proposed framework is tested by data collected from the Indian manufacturing industries and using partial least squares (PLS) technique. The findings demonstrate proactive environment strategy as an important antecedent for GPRI practices. Second, technological capabilities and organizational learning mediate between GPRI and operational performance. The results of the study are useful for managers in the manufacturing firms, who are interested to implement GPRI practices or who are in the early stage of implementing the GPRI practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264
Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y · Cited by 1,067
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Asiaei, K., O'Connor, N. G., Barani, O., & Joshi, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3136 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatia, M. S.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2845-2857
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W3137107939
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 22.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.2775
- The paper
- Bhatia, M. S. (2021). Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.