Cited by 1,067Survey Methodology and NonresponseBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles

Hulland, John, Baumgartner, Hans, Smith, Keith Marion·2018·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Hulland, John
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
92-108
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
OpenAlex
W2606700149
Cited by
1,067
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
95.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
survey methodology, best practices, market analysis, survey design, survey administration, survey data analysis, Journal of Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review