The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability labelling schemes: the logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders
Open accessAbstract
In this paper the author examines the role of labelling and certification schemes in the pursuit of policies to make production and consumption processes more sustainable. From a logical point of view, labels are conceived as claims put forward by sellers to inform buyers about certain characteristics of their products. In the case of sustainability, labels might identify relevant ‘ideals’ to approach and/or significant ‘ills’ to escape. Toulmin's argumentation theory is used to show how claims can be substantiated and challenged. Based on literature on the behaviour of the main stakeholders, the author discusses what labelling means for producers, consumers, policymakers and other groups in society. In the conclusions, attention is drawn to the way in which societal pressure might interact with market forces to shape the information environment for products and services. As a result, the role of sustainability labels might become more differentiated, varying from direct shopping aids to background quality assurances. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising
Roberts, J. A. (1996) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6 · Cited by 1,603
Cited by
Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity?
Ozaki, R. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.650 · Cited by 422
Sammer, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.522 · Cited by 414
Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe
Wagner, M. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.001 · Cited by 340
Turunen, L. L. M., & Halme, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126605 · Cited by 101
The Well(s) of Knowledge: The Decoding of Sustainability Claims in the UK and in Greece
Alevizou, P., Oates, C., & McDonald, S. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7078729 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, J.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 254-264
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2137118329
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.