Decoding the impact of firm‐level ESG performance on financial disclosure quality
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on financial disclosure quality as measured by disaggregated financial statements (FSDQ), using data from US‐listed companies between 2002 and 2021. We find a positive association between ESG performance and FSDQ quality, suggesting that improved ESG performance is linked to enhanced disclosure quality and accountability and that managerial competence and strong organizational culture accentuate this relationship. Further analysis shows a stronger link between firms with high‐quality accounting practices and good financial reporting readability, whereas complex financial reporting weakens this relationship. Our findings remain valid when alternative measures of key variables are used, and under propensity score analysis, Heckman's two‐stage estimation, and cross‐lagged and entropy balancing techniques, ensuring the analysis is robust and reliable. Overall, our findings provide important new insights into ESG performance, suggesting it fosters enhanced disclosure and accountability to stakeholders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3 · Cited by 3,481 · see citing works
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10218 · Cited by 1,916 · see citing works
Corporate social responsibility and media coverage
Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., Chen, L., & Nguyen, N. H. (2015) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.004 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Ferdous, L. T., Rana, T., & Yeboah, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rana, Tarek
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-186
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W4403041590
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 22
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- RMIT University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
- Keywords
- ESG performance, financial disclosure quality, corporate accountability, managerial competencies, organizational culture, accounting quality, financial reporting readability, US listed companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
