The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware! environmental labelling and the limitations of ‘green’ consumerism
Abstract
In recent years, the idea of ‘green’ or ‘political’ consumers expressing their political beliefs in everyday life has been widely embraced. Eager to satisfy the needs of this new market segment, firms have allocated substantial resources to environmental management, social accountability, corporate citizenship, occupational health and safety etc. During the 1990s, the industrialized world also witnessed a growing number of environmental labels, expected to guide the political consumers in their shopping decisions. Evaluations of these environmental labelling (eco-labelling) programmes indicate that some labels and product groups receive a great deal of attention while others remain in obscurity. To understand these differences, the paper will discuss some of the factors that determine the market impact of environmental labelling. It is concluded that the concept of the ‘green’ consumer is over-simplified and fails to capture the actual complexity of consumer values, attitudes and behaviour. The results are based on existing literature and our own empirical findings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review and Critical Assessment of Research on Marketing and the Environment
Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725798784867716 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms
Peattie, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328 · Cited by 964
Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1
Melville, N. P. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721412 · Cited by 868
Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior
Moser, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2014-1179 · Cited by 657
Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review
Etzion, D. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307302553 · Cited by 630
What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao
Zhao, H.-H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y.-P., Wang, Y., & Zhu, X.-D. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-29
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2161222966
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware! environmental labelling and the limitations of ‘green’ consumerism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.434
- The paper
- Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2006). Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware! environmental labelling and the limitations of ‘green’ consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.