Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1
Abstract
Human life is dependent upon the natural environment, which, most would agree, is rapidly degrading. Business enterprises are a dominant form of social organization and contribute to the worsening, and enhancement, of the natural environment. Scholars in the administrative sciences examine questions spanning organizations and the natural environment but have largely omitted the information systems perspective. We develop a research agenda on information systems innovation for environmental sustainability that demonstrates the critical role that IS can play in shaping beliefs about the environment, in enabling and transforming sustainable processes and practices in organizations, and in improving environmental and economic performance. The belief–action–outcome (BAO) framework and associated research agenda provide the basis for a new discourse on IS for environmental sustainability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A preliminary phase in operationalising the proposed design cycle and implementing sustainability transitions is the strategic realignment of IS, and/or the higher education system to proceed toward the production of knowledge and socio-technical innovations that are purpose driven and in the public interest, facilitating an integrated and responsive approach to addressing global challenges.
“A preliminary phase in operationalising the proposed design cycle and implementing sustainability transitions is the strategic realignment of IS, and/or the higher education system to proceed toward the production of knowledge and socio-technical innovations that are purpose driven and in the public interest (Abbas & Michael, 2021), facilitating an integrated and responsive approach to addressing”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Melville, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 868
- Authors
- Melville, N. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Melville, Nigel P.
- ORCID
- Melville, Nigel P.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W3146234350
- Semantic Scholar
- fa4ac6c1304a408b430f9951a35efb642c28b4a4
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 29.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- information systems innovation, environmental sustainability, environmental beliefs, sustainable business practices, environmental performance, economic performance, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review