The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting
Open accessAbstract
Internationally, there is growing awareness of the environmental and social impacts of the business activities of organizations. This awareness was heightened by the 1987 report Our Common Future by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987). In order to address the concerns raised, companies have increasingly reported the social and environmental impacts of their business activities to secure their right to operate from society. This paper argues for the importance of an integrated reporting framework that provides information on economic performance via intellectual capital (IC) information and non‐economic performance, including that used in the management of performance across social and environmental impacts. This paper briefly reviews three extended reporting approaches, namely IC, balanced scorecard (BSC) and social and environmental reporting. The paper demonstrates that the emphases of these reporting approaches, while diverse, could be complementary to one another and be integrated into an extended performance reporting framework (EPRF), which would provide a more complete account of the management and performance of an organization. The EPRF could empower stakeholders and facilitate change in the way organizations conduct their activities. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategy
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.339 · Cited by 1,245
Cited by
Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box
Parker, L. D. (2005) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570510627739 · Cited by 698
Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.002 · Cited by 519
Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · Cited by 347
Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report
Farneti, F., & Guthrie, J. (2009) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2009.04.002 · Cited by 320
Self-citationSustainable procurement practice
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.678 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Yongvanich, K., & Guthrie, J.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-20
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 309-321
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2094114327
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.