Cited by 347Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainability and Innovation in BusinessCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business

Morioka, Sandra Naomi, de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Several publications approach the subject of corporate sustainability performance, considering this background, the present research conducts a systematic literature review based on 261 papers towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Moreover, it aims at structuring the literature on corporate sustainability performance to highlight its main contributions and gaps. Data analysis initiates with a descriptive statistics of the sample, including yearly distribution, main journals, and most cited papers. It is followed by the delimitation of each sustainability performance approach of measurement, management and reporting and the cross analysis among them. Finally, a conceptual framework is proposed to address the integration of sustainability performance into business. This framework is composed by three levels. The first represents the principles for corporate sustainability to guide decision-making driven by collective values. The second level includes the core sustainable business elements, which are processes and practices, capabilities, offerings and contributions to sustainable development. At the third level, the context factors represent the internal and external aspects that affect the previous levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Morioka, Sandra Naomi
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
136
Pages
134-146
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2273607023
Cited by
347
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  • Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
corporate sustainability performance, sustainability performance measurement, sustainability reporting, conceptual framework, sustainable business practices, sustainable development, corporate decision-making, contextual factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review