The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers
Abstract
This article explores the influence of societal, political and regulatory characteristics and developments on the quality of corporate sustainability disclosures in Norway. The paper presents an assessment both of mandatory reporting under the Norwegian Accounting Act, and of voluntary reporting in annual and separate non‐financial reports, by the 100 largest firms in Norway. Our results reveal that only 10% of the companies comply with the legal requirements on environmental reporting, while only half of the firms comply with the legal reporting provisions on working environment and gender equality. The vast majority of firms also report unsatisfactorily on non‐financial issues in the voluntary disclosures assessed. Analysing the causes of these results, we contend that the situation is characterized by (1) an apparent lack of political and social drivers for sustainability reporting in Norway and (2) an absence of sufficient monitoring and enforcement of the environmental reporting legislation on the part of Norwegian authorities. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Cited by
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 · Cited by 1,775
The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 · Cited by 1,537
Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures
Yu, E. P.-Y., Luu, B. V., & Chen, C. H. (2020) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 · Cited by 1,119
An Analysis of Indicators Disclosed in Corporate Sustainability Reports
Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002 · Cited by 670
What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review
Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-08-2014-0050 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Vormedal, I., & Ruud, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 207-222
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1976060236
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.560
- The paper
- Vormedal, I., & Ruud, A. (2009). Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.