The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change
Abstract
In this paper, we review the debate surrounding whether or not the natural environment should be considered an organizational stakeholder. We argue for a broad definition of stakeholders, and present a case for the natural environment being an easily identifiable primary stakeholder when climate change is brought into the debate. We develop a conceptual stakeholder identification framework by combining and extending the work of Mitchell, Agle and Wood, and Driscoll and Starik. We approach the stakeholder issue from a strategic rather than moral or ethical perspective. In particular, we contend that power, legitimacy, urgency and proximity are combined when climatic changes, such as increasingly frequent anomalous extreme weather, can damage business infrastructure, resources, products and market, overshadowing moral and ethical aspects of the debate. We also identify key implications for business and policymakers, and highlight opportunities for future research. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4 · Cited by 379
Cited by
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1939 · Cited by 1,370
Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.708 · Cited by 457
Self-citationPerez-Batres, L. A., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003 · Cited by 131
Enabling Circular Economy Through Product Stewardship
Jensen, J. P., & Remmen, A. (2017) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.048 · Cited by 130
Waktola, B. S., Singh, M., & Singh, S. (2024) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-01-2024-0004 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-31
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 347-359
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2023652165
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.602
- The paper
- Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.