Cited by 379Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityManagement and Organizational Studies

Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders

Neville, Benjamin A., Menguc, Bulent·2006·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stakeholder marketing recognizes that stakeholders interact directly or indirectly with each other.

    “stakeholder marketing recognizes that stakeholders interact directly or indirectly with each other (Rowley 1997;Neville and Menguc 2006;Shipilov and Li 2012)”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Neville and Menguc 2006

  • Scholarly work on stakeholder theory remains mostly focused on dyadic relationships and does not capture the complex interactions within the stakeholder network to their full extent.

    “Scholarly work on stakeholder theory, although holistic in its aim and origin, remains mostly focused on dyadic relationships and does not capture the complex interactions within the stakeholder network to their full extent (Neville and Menguc 2006).”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Neville and Menguc 2006

  • Stakeholder networks are likely to be characterized by tension.

    “They have different interests and, as a result, stakeholder networks are likely to be characterized by tension (Oliver 1991;Wood and Jones 1995;Neville and Menguc 2006).”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Neville and Menguc 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Neville, Benjamin A.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2006-07
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
377-391
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2002499508
Cited by
379
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
40.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
stakeholder interaction, stakeholder theory, stakeholder identification, stakeholder salience, stakeholder networks, government stakeholders, employee stakeholders, environmental concern

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review