The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice
Abstract
Recently, innovation processes towards sustainable development have received increasing attention in academic literature. This research introduces the combination of insights from innovation theory, sustainable development practice and small business characteristics to unlock new knowledge on factors that influence the translation of sustainable innovation within small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) into practice. The sustainability themes and activities as described for large companies (i.e. in the sustainability reporting and management literature) were used as starting point in this study. It presents empiric results of the PRIMA Project conducted within the rubber and plastics industry (RPI) on sustainable innovation activities. It will show that many sustainable innovations are directed at the improvement of technological processes (eco‐efficiency) and to lower costs of production. These innovations can be seen as incremental. Companies with sustainability integrated in their orientation and innovation processes show value creation: the development of products new to the market (radical innovations) and cooperation with stakeholders. The PRIMA project shows that more insight in SME innovative characteristics and (e)valuation of sustainable innovation efforts provides opportunities to improve the sustainability performance of SMEs. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do
Amabile, T. M. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165921 · Cited by 2,243
Measuring up to sustainability
Fricker, A. (1998) · Futures · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(98)00041-x · Cited by 131
Cited by
Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: insights from circular economy business cases
Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2447 · Cited by 326
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2837 · Cited by 291
Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259 · Cited by 188
Maziliauske, E. (2024) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101201 · Cited by 100
Achmad, G. N., Yudaruddin, R., Nugroho, B. A., Fitrian, Z., Suharsono, S., Adi, A. S., Hafsari, P., & Fitriansyah, F. (2023) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Bos‐Brouwers, H. E. J.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-23
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 417-435
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2019408632
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
