CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainability and Innovation in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Government support, eco-regulation and eco-innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating role of eco-environmental

Open access
Achmad, Gusti Noorlitaria, Yudaruddin, Rizky, Nugroho, Bramantyo Adi, Fitrian, Zhikry, Suharsono, Suharsono, Adi, Ari Sasmoko, Hafsari, Pebiansyah, Fitriansyah, Fitriansyah·2023·Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
DOI 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a vital role in economic development and sustainability. In Indonesia, SMEs account for a significant portion of the economy but face challenges in adapting to eco-innovation practices. To address this issue, this study examines the role of eco-regulation and government support in promoting eco-innovation adaptation among SMEs in Indonesia. We also explore the moderating effect of eco-environmental factors, including eco-customers, eco-managerial, eco-competition, and eco-process innovation. We collect data from 859 SMEs in Indonesia and use the Structural Equal Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method to analyze the data. We measure eco-regulation and government support as independent variables and eco-environmental factors as moderating variables. We use eco-innovation adaptation as the dependent variable. Our results show that eco-regulation and government support have a positive effect on eco-environmental factors, except for eco-customers. We also find that eco-environmental factors have a positive impact on eco-innovation adaptation. Furthermore, we find that eco-regulation and government support indirectly influence eco-innovation adaptation through the mediation of eco-environmental factors. In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of eco-regulation and government support in promoting eco-innovation adaptation among SMEs in Indonesia. We find that eco-environmental factors mediate the relationship between eco-regulation and government support and eco-innovation adaptation. Our study provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to enhance SMEs' eco-innovation practices and promote sustainable development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Achmad, 2023, Eco-innovation and SME performance in time of Covid-19 pandemic: moderating role of environmental collaboration, Emerg. Sci. J., 7, 251, 10.28991/ESJ-2023-SPER-018 · DOI
  2. Afshari, 2020, The role of eco-innovation drivers in promoting additive manufacturing in supply chains, Int. J. Prod. Econ.
  3. Al-Hanakta, 2021, Intermediaries motivating eco-innovation in Jordanian small and medium-sized enterprises., Econ. Ann. -XXI, 191, 88
  4. Al-Hanakta, 2023, Eco-innovation influence on business performance in Jordanian micro, small and medium enterprises operating in the food processing sector, PLoS ONE, 18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0281664 · DOI
  5. Amalia, 2022, The Impact of Board Structure on Voluntary Environmental and Energy Disclosure in an Emerging Market, Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, 12, 430, 10.32479/ijeep.13154 · DOI
  6. Andersson, 2020, The organizational climate for psychological safety: associations with SMEs’ innovation capabilities and innovation performance, J. Eng. Technol. Manag., 55, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101554 · DOI
  7. Arfi, 2018, External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 129, 210, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017 · DOI
  8. Arranz, 2021, How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms?, J. Clean. Prod., 297, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126692 · DOI
  9. Bitencourt, 2020, Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: a meta-analytic approach, J. Clean. Prod., 245, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721 · DOI
  10. Bos-Brouwers, 2010, Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice, Bus. Strategy Environ., 19, 417, 10.1002/bse.652 · DOI
  11. Campbell, 2007, Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, Acad. Manag. Rev., 32, 946, 10.5465/amr.2007.25275684 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Caprar, 2012, Norming” and “Conforming”: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business, J. Bus. Ethics, 110, 231, 10.1007/s10551-012-1424-1 · DOI
  13. Ch’ng, 2021, Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: the moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry, J. Clean. Prod., 283, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124556 · DOI
  14. Chen, 2019, Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation, J. Bus. Res., 0
  15. Cornejo-Canamares, 2021, Environmental objectives and non-technological innovation in Spanish manufacturing SMEs, J. Clean. Prod., 296, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126445 · DOI
  16. DiMaggio, 1983, The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, Am. Sociol. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dogaru, 2020, Eco-Innovation and the Contribution of Companies to the Sustainable Development, Procedia Manuf., 46, 294, 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.043 · DOI
  18. Fernandez, 2021, Drivers of eco-innovation in developing countries: the case of Chilean firms, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 170, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120902 · DOI
  19. Frigon, 2020, Drivers of eco-innovation and conventional innovation in the Canadian wine industry, J. Clean. Prod., 275, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124115 · DOI
  20. García-Granero, 2020, Measuring ecoinnovation dimensions: the role of environmental corporate culture and commercial orientation, Res. Policy, 49, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104028 · DOI
  21. Geng, 2021, Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 231, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107869 · DOI
  22. Hamdani, 2012, Open Innovation Implementation to Sustain Indonesian SMEs, Procedia Econ. Financ., 4, 223, 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00337-1 · DOI
  23. Han, 2021, Determinants of eco-innovation adoption of small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis in Myanmar, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 173, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121146 · DOI
  24. Horbach, 2012, Determinants of Eco-Innovations by Type of Environmental Impact—The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull, Ecol. Econ., 78, 112, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005 · DOI
  25. Kasim, 2007, Corporate environmentalism in the hotel sector: evidence of drivers and barriers in Penang, Malaysia, J. Sustain. Tour., 15, 680, 10.2167/jost575.0 · DOI
  26. Kautish, 2022, Antecedents of sustainable fashion apparel purchase behavior, J. Consum. Mark., 39, 475, 10.1108/JCM-04-2020-3733 · DOI
  27. Kautish, 2020, Determinants of pro-environmental behavior and environmentally conscious consumer behavior: an empirical investigation from emerging market, Bus. Strategy Dev., 3, 112, 10.1002/bsd2.82 · DOI
  28. Kemp, 2010, Eco-Innovation: Definition, measurement and open research issues, Econ. Polit., 27, 397
  29. Kemp, 2008, Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10, 1
  30. Khare, 2017, Role of green self-identity and peer influence in fostering trust towards organic food retailers, Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., 45, 969, 10.1108/IJRDM-07-2016-0109 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kousar, 2017, Technological factors and adoption of green innovation: Moderating role of government intervention: a case of SMEs in Pakistan, Johar Education Society, Pak. (JESPK), 11, 833
  32. Kraus, 2020, Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 160, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262 · DOI
  33. Leenders, 2013, Antecedents and consequences of green innovation in the wine industry: the role of channel structure, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 25, 203, 10.1080/09537325.2012.759203 · DOI
  34. Lepoutre, 2006, Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review, J. Bus. Ethics, 67, 257, 10.1007/s10551-006-9183-5 · DOI
  35. Lestari, 2021, The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on performance of small enterprises that are e-commerce adopters and non-adopters, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 19, 467
  36. Li, 2018, Impacts of government subsidies for environmental-friendly products in a dual-channel supplychain, J. Clean. Prod., 171, 1558, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.056 · DOI
  37. Liao, 2019, Innovation intensity, creativity enhancement, and ecoinnovation strategy: the roles of customer demand and environmental regulation, Bus. Strategy Environ., 28, 316, 10.1002/bse.2232 · DOI
  38. Li-Ying, 2018, Linking forms of inbound open innovation to a driver-based typology of environmental innovation: Evidence from French manufacturing firms, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 135, 51, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.031 · DOI
  39. Lo, 2014, Only reasoned action? An interorganizational study of energy-saving behaviors in office buildings, Energy Effic., 7, 761, 10.1007/s12053-014-9254-x · DOI
  40. Maria, 2022, The impact of COVID-19 on bank stability: Do bank size and ownership matter?, Banks Bank Syst., 17, 124, 10.21511/bbs.17(2).2022.11 · DOI
  41. Mercado-Caruso, 2020, Identifying endogenous and exogenous indicators to measure eco-innovation within clusters, Sustainability, 12, 6088, 10.3390/su12156088 · DOI
  42. Muhammad, 2020, COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: a blessing in disguise?, Sci. Total Environ., 728, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138820 · DOI
  43. Qi, 2010, The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: an industry perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 1358, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017 · DOI
  44. Rana, 2022, Moral identity, consumption values and green purchase behaviour, J. Islam. Mark.
  45. Riadi, 2022, The Benefits of e-Commerce before and during the Covid-19 Pandemic for Small Enterprises in Indonesia, WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., 18, 69, 10.37394/232015.2022.18.8 · DOI
  46. Sanni, 2018, Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 131, 303, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.007 · DOI
  47. Sehnem, 2016, Sustainable practices and eco-innovations adopted by industrial companies, Int. J. Innov., 4, 42, 10.5585/iji.v4i2.106 · DOI
  48. Shahzad, 2020, Translating stakeholders’pressure into environmental practices–the mediating role of knowledge management, J. Clean. Prod., 275, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124163 · DOI
  49. Singh, 2020, Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 150, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762 · DOI
  50. Song, 2020, Effects of green human resource management and managerial environmental concern on green innovation, Eur. J. Innov. Manag.
  51. Su, 2021, Towards achieving sustainable development: Role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO2 emission for BRICS, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 277, 10.3390/ijerph18010277 · DOI
  52. Suminah, 2022, Determinants of micro, small, and medium-scale enterprise performers’ income during the COVID-19 pandemic era, Heliyon, 8, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09875 · DOI
  53. Sumrin, 2021, Ecoinnovation for environment and waste prevention, J. Bus. Res., 122, 627, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.001 · DOI
  54. Tamvada, 2020, Corporate social responsibility and accountability: A new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR, Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib., 5
  55. Ulfah, 2021, Ownership composition and intellectual capital disclosure: Indonesia as a case study, Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov., 18, 37
  56. Ullah, 2022, Promoting sustainability through green innovation adoption: A case of manufacturing industry, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Res., 29, 21119, 10.1007/s11356-021-17322-8 · DOI
  57. Wang, 2020, Antecedents, mediation effects and outcomes of hotel eco-innovation practice, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 85, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102345 · DOI
  58. Wasiq, 2023, Factors Influencing Green Innovation Adoption and Its Impact on the Sustainability Performance of Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Saudi Arabia, Sustainability, 15, 2447, 10.3390/su15032447 · DOI
  59. Yudaruddin, 2023, Government policy response to COVID-19 and bank performance: a comparison between Islamic and conventional banks, J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res., 10.1108/JIABR-09-2022-0248 · DOI
  60. Yurdakul, 2020, Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies, Sustainability, 12, 3167, 10.3390/su12083167 · DOI
  61. Zainurossalamia, 2022, Impact of operational activities on customer satisfaction in cafes and restaurants: A mediating role of infrastructural elements, Innov. Mark., 18, 13, 10.21511/im.18(4).2022.02 · DOI
  62. Zhang, 2020, Critical success factors of green innovation: technology, organization and environment readiness, J. Clean. Prod., 264, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Zubeltzu-Jaka, 2018, Shedding light on the determinants of eco-innovation: a meta-analytic study, Bus. Strategy Environ., 27, 1093, 10.1002/bse.2054 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 69

Metadata

Authors
Achmad, G. N., Yudaruddin, R., Nugroho, B. A., Fitrian, Z., Suharsono, S., Adi, A. S., Hafsari, P., & Fitriansyah, F.
Affiliations
  • Mulawarman University (ID)
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur (ID)
Corresponding author
  • Achmad, Gusti Noorlitaria
  • Yudaruddin, Rizky
  • Nugroho, Bramantyo Adi
  • Fitrian, Zhikry
  • Suharsono, Suharsono
  • Adi, Ari Sasmoko
  • Hafsari, Pebiansyah
  • Fitriansyah, Fitriansyah
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
100158
ISSN
2199-8531 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158
OpenAlex
W4387817224
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
small and medium-sized enterprises, government support, mediating effect, sustainable development, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Government support, eco-regulation and eco-innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating role of eco-environmental. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158
The paper
Achmad, G. N., Yudaruddin, R., Nugroho, B. A., Fitrian, Z., Suharsono, S., Adi, A. S., Hafsari, P., & Fitriansyah, F. (2023). Government support, eco-regulation and eco-innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating role of eco-environmental. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158