Cited by 46Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention (CBT‐SP): Implications for meeting standard of care expectations with suicidal patients

Bryan, Craig J.·2019·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

Accumulating evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention (CBT-SP) as an empirically supported treatment approach for suicidal patients. In light of these findings, several procedures pulled from CBT-SP have been recommended for standard care with suicidal patients. The present article provides an overview of the procedures used in CBT-SP and discusses how these procedures meet, or even exceed, standard of care expectations for outpatient mental healthcare clinicians. Finally, the relevance of clinician fidelity to the CBT-SP model when evaluating standard of care expectations is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.2411

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryan, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Bryan, Craig J.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
247-258
ISSN
  • 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0798
OpenAlex
W2945092273
Cited by
46
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicidal patients, standard of care, outpatient psychiatric care, empirically supported treatments
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Suicide Prevention, Crisis Intervention, Humans, Motivation, Outpatients, Patient Care Planning, Self Care, Social Support, Suicide, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review