Cited by 43Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Use of crisis management interventions among suicidal patients: results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Bryan, Craig J., May, Alexis M., Rozek, David C., Williams, Sean R., Clemans, Tracy A., Mintz, Jim, Leeson, Bruce, Burch, T. Scott·2018·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research supports the efficacy of the crisis response plan (CRP) for the reduction of suicidal behaviors as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Patient perspectives and use of the CRP, and their relationship to later suicidal thoughts, remain unknown. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing a standard CRP (S-CRP), a CRP enhanced with reasons for living (E-CRP), and TAU in a sample of 97 active-duty U.S. Army personnel was conducted. Participants were asked about their use, perceptions, and recall of each intervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to test the conditional effects of intervention use, perceptions, and recall on severity of suicide ideation during follow-up. RESULTS: Across all treatment groups, over 80% of participants retained their written CRP up to 6 months later, but less than 25% had the written plan in their physical possession at the time of each assessment. Participants in S-CRP and E-CRP were more likely to recall self-management strategies and sources of social support. Participants in TAU were more likely to recall use of professional healthcare services and crisis management services. All three interventions were rated as highly useful. More frequent use of the E-CRP and recall of its components were associated with significantly reduced suicide ideation as compared to TAU. CONCLUSIONS: Both CRPs have high acceptability ratings. The effect of both CRPs on reduced suicide ideation is associated with patient recall of components. More frequent use of the E-CRP is associated with larger reductions in suicide ideation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22753

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crisis response or safety planning is associated with rapid changes in suicidal thoughts within hours and decreased risk of suicide attempt within months.

    “Another new treatment approach is crisis response or safety planning, an outgrowth of cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention that is associated with rapid changes in suicidal thoughts within hours (12) and decreased risk of suicide attempt within months (13, 14).”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reid, W. H. (1998). Promises, promises: Don't rely on patients' no- suicide/no-violence "contracts." Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behav- ioral Health, 4, 316-318.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryan, C. J., May, A. M., Rozek, D. C., Williams, S. R., Clemans, T. A., Mintz, J., Leeson, B., & Burch, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • United States Department of the Army (US)
Corresponding author
Bryan, Craig J.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-10
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
619-628
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2800263609
Cited by
43
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research and Materiel Command (W81XWH‐10‐2‐0181)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicidal ideation, reasons for living, intervention use, treatment acceptability, active duty military personnel, self-management strategies, social support
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, United States, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review