The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key questions to consider in stalking cases
Abstract
Stalkers can inflict severe injury upon and have been known to kill their victims. Based on the detailed responses of 1,565 stalking victims, a set of key questions was produced with the aim of increasing the opportunities of police officers to identify potentially dangerous stalkers. Despite marked methodological differences and the inclusion of a large number of variables, regression analyses for significant correlates for physical assault per se and for severe violence largely reflected the results of earlier works. For severe violence (n = 136), the most important correlate was a high level of victim fear, suggesting that victims are adept at assessing their own risk of stalker violence. The set of 11 questions performed well on preliminary tests and is presented here. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different risk factors are associated with moderate versus severe intimate partner stalking violence.
“despite evidence that different risk factors are associated with moderate (e.g., grabbing, slapping) versus severe (e.g., choking, using a knife against someone) intimate partner stalking violence (James & Farnham, 2003; Sheridan & Roberts, 2011; Thompson et al., 2013).”
From Police-Identified Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and Physical Violence Among Male Intimate Partner Stalkers (2025) · cites this paper as Sheridan & Roberts, 2011
Citations
Cites
The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001 · Cited by 382
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996, Women's Safety, Australia
- 10.1002/9780470713037.ch6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10896-007-9128-5 · DOI
- Blaauw E., 2002, Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession, 23
- Brewster M. P., 2002, Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators, 292
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04706-6 · DOI
- 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.4.371 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS15339J · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260504265619 · DOI
- James D. V., 2003, Stalking and serious violence, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 432
- 10.1520/JFS14660J · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0033291708004996 · DOI
- Meloy J. R., 1992, Violent attachments
- 10.1016/1359-1789(95)00013-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139106863 · DOI
- Mullen P. E., 1999, Study of stalkers, The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244, 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854803259241 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/009385402237998 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-005-3318-6 · DOI
- 10.1177/0306624X02461005 · DOI
- 10.2307/1143017 · DOI
- 10.1300/J177v01n03_03 · DOI
- Sheridan L., 2002, Stalker typologies and intervention strategies, Polizei und Wissenschaft (Special Issue on Stalking), 4, 15
- 10.1002/9780470713037.ch5 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbm.375 · DOI
- 10.1080/10683160701340528 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524838002237330 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpsyc.55.5.393 · DOI
- 10.1080/00048670802277230 · DOI · Paper page
- Tjaden P., 1998, Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women survey
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landwehr, E., Roberts, L., Garratt-Reed, D., & Maxwell-Smith, C. (2025) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x241228977 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheridan, L., & Roberts, K.
- Affiliations
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- Charles Sturt University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sheridan, Lorraine
- ORCID
- Sheridan, Lorraine
- Venue
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-27
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-270
- ISSN
- 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0798
- OpenAlex
- W1965461179
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- stalking, stalking victims, physical assault, risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Violence, Crime Victims, Stalking, Criminals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
