The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Very high density of CHO cells in perfusion by ATF or TFF in WAVE bioreactor™. Part I. Effect of the cell density on the process
Open accessAbstract
High cell density perfusion process of antibody producing CHO cells was developed in disposable WAVE Bioreactor™ using external hollow fiber filter as cell separation device. Both “classical” tangential flow filtration (TFF) and alternating tangential flow system (ATF) equipment were used and compared. Consistency of both TFF‐ and ATF‐based cultures was shown at 20–35 × 10 6 cells/mL density stabilized by cell bleeds. To minimize the nutrients deprivation and by‐product accumulation, a perfusion rate correlated to the cell density was applied. The cells were maintained by cell bleeds at density 0.9–1.3 × 10 8 cells/mL in growing state and at high viability for more than 2 weeks. Finally, with the present settings, maximal cell densities of 2.14 × 10 8 cells/mL, achieved for the first time in a wave‐induced bioreactor, and 1.32 × 10 8 cells/mL were reached using TFF and ATF systems, respectively. Using TFF, the cell density was limited by the membrane capacity for the encountered high viscosity and by the pCO 2 level. Using ATF, the cell density was limited by the vacuum capacity failing to pull the highly viscous fluid. Thus, the TFF system allowed reaching higher cell densities. The TFF inlet pressure was highly correlated to the viscosity leading to the development of a model of this pressure, which is a useful tool for hollow fiber design of TFF and ATF. At very high cell density, the viscosity introduced physical limitations. This led us to recommend cell densities under 1.46 × 10 8 cell/mL based on the analysis of the theoretical distance between the cells for the present cell line. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 29:754–767, 2013
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trends in Upstream and Downstream Process Development for Antibody Manufacturing
Gronemeyer, P., Ditz, R., & Strube, J. (2014) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering1040188 · Cited by 329
Ritacco, F. V., Wu, Y., & Khetan, A. (2018) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.2706 · Cited by 273
Karst, D. J., Serra, E., Villiger, T. K., Soos, M., & Morbidelli, M. (2016) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2016.02.003 · Cited by 151
High-density mammalian cell cultures in stirred-tank bioreactor without external pH control
Xu, S., & Chen, H. (2016) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.019 · Cited by 99
Mahal, H., Branton, H., & Farid, S. S. (2021) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27774 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Clincke, M., Mölleryd, C., Zhang, Y., Lindskog, E., Walsh, K., & Chotteau, V.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 754-767
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W1995924547
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Very high density of CHO cells in perfusion by ATF or TFF in WAVE bioreactor™. Part I. Effect of the cell density on the process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/btpr.1704
- The paper
- Clincke, M., Mölleryd, C., Zhang, Y., Lindskog, E., Walsh, K., & Chotteau, V. (2013). Very high density of CHO cells in perfusion by ATF or TFF in WAVE bioreactor™. Part I. Effect of the cell density on the process. Biotechnology Progress. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.