Cited by 41Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAnimal Genetics and ReproductionMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Generation of stable Chinese hamster ovary pools yielding antibody titers of up to 7. 6 g/L using the piggyBac transposon system

Rajendra, Yashas, Peery, Robert B., Barnard, Gavin C.·2016·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells remain the default production host for many biopharmaceutical drugs, particularly monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Production of gram and kilogram quantities of protein typically requires the generation of stable CHO clones. Unfortunately, this process takes several months, significantly slowing down the drug discovery and development process. Therefore, improved technologies are needed to accelerate biopharmaceutical drug discovery and final drug substance manufacturing. In this study, we describe the generation of stable CHO pools using the piggyBac transposon system. We evaluated the system using four model antibody molecules (3 mAbs and 1 bispecific Ab). Stable CHO pools were isolated in 7–12 days. Using a simple 16‐day fed‐batch process, we measured titers ranging from 2.3 to 7.6 g/L for the four model antibodies. This represented a 4‐ to 12‐fold increase relative to the controls. Additionally, we isolated stable CHO clones. We found that the stable CHO clones isolated from the piggyBac transposon pools yielded titers two to threefold higher relative to the control clones. Taken together, these results suggest that stable CHO pool and clone generation can be significantly improved by using the piggyBac transposon system. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1301–1307, 2016

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/btpr.2307

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PiggyBac approach has recently shown improved yields for stable production of antibodies in CHO cell lines.

    “This approach has recently shown improved yields for stable production of antibodies in CHO cell lines (Rajendra et al., 2016).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Rajendra et al., 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajendra, Y., Peery, R. B., & Barnard, G. C.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Barnard, Gavin C.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-29
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1301-1307
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W2408938989
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
CHO cells, piggyBac transposon, monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, fed-batch fermentation, transposon mutagenesis, biopharmaceutical manufacturing
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Cricetulus, DNA Transposable Elements, CHO Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review