Generation of stable Chinese hamster ovary pools yielding antibody titers of up to 7. 6 g/L using the piggyBac transposon system
Abstract
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells remain the default production host for many biopharmaceutical drugs, particularly monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Production of gram and kilogram quantities of protein typically requires the generation of stable CHO clones. Unfortunately, this process takes several months, significantly slowing down the drug discovery and development process. Therefore, improved technologies are needed to accelerate biopharmaceutical drug discovery and final drug substance manufacturing. In this study, we describe the generation of stable CHO pools using the piggyBac transposon system. We evaluated the system using four model antibody molecules (3 mAbs and 1 bispecific Ab). Stable CHO pools were isolated in 7–12 days. Using a simple 16‐day fed‐batch process, we measured titers ranging from 2.3 to 7.6 g/L for the four model antibodies. This represented a 4‐ to 12‐fold increase relative to the controls. Additionally, we isolated stable CHO clones. We found that the stable CHO clones isolated from the piggyBac transposon pools yielded titers two to threefold higher relative to the control clones. Taken together, these results suggest that stable CHO pool and clone generation can be significantly improved by using the piggyBac transposon system. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1301–1307, 2016
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PiggyBac approach has recently shown improved yields for stable production of antibodies in CHO cell lines.
“This approach has recently shown improved yields for stable production of antibodies in CHO cell lines (Rajendra et al., 2016).”
From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Rajendra et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells
Lalonde, M.-E., & Durocher, Y. (2017) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.028 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rajendra, Y., Peery, R. B., & Barnard, G. C.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barnard, Gavin C.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1301-1307
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2408938989
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- CHO cells, piggyBac transposon, monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, fed-batch fermentation, transposon mutagenesis, biopharmaceutical manufacturing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Cricetulus, DNA Transposable Elements, CHO Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review