Cited by 107

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three‐dimensional mesh diagram analysis

Ferrario, Virgilio F., Sforza, Chiarella, Serrao, Graziano, Ciusa, Veronica, Dellavia, Claudia·2003·Clinical Anatomy

Abstract

The normal growth, development, and aging of facial soft tissues was studied by three‐dimensional (3D) computerized mesh diagram analysis. The 3D coordinates of 50 soft‐tissue landmarks were collected from 591 healthy white northern Italians (351 males, 240 females) 6–40 years of age. For each gender and age class, mean values were computed, and a standardized mesh of equidistant horizontal, vertical, and anterior‐posterior lines was constructed. Within each age group, male meshes were superimposed on female meshes. For each gender, the 6‐year‐old reference mesh was superimposed on the reference mesh of each age group. The global (size plus shape) difference was evaluated by calculating the relevant displacement vectors for each landmark. Consequently, a size normalization was carried out and the shape difference was evaluated by calculating new relevant displacement vectors for each landmark. Growth and development were different along the three spatial planes: the largest increment was observed in the vertical dimension, with major modifications in the soft‐tissue profile. The vertical dimension in males increased even after 30 years of age: ear dimensions increased, trichion moved superiorly and posteriorly, and pogonion, menton, and gonion moved anteriorly and inferiorly. In all age groups, size‐standardized shape differences were found in the forehead, lower‐third facial profile, eyes, cheeks, and ears. In each age class, male dimensions were larger than female dimensions. During childhood, gender differences in size were limited; shape differences were even less manifest. Overall, the profile was more anterior and inferior, the gonia were more inferior and more lateral, the forehead was more anterior, and the ears were larger in males than in females of corresponding age. Clin. Anat. 16:420–433, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ca.10154

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80022-4 · DOI
  2. Enlow DH, 1990, Facial growth, 562
  3. Farkas LG, 1994, Anthropometry of the head and face, 3
  4. 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0010:AOAMPP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  5. Farkas LG, 1994, Anthropometry of the head and face, 181
  6. Farkas LG, 1994, Anthropometry of the head and face, 241
  7. Ferrario VF, 1995, New television technique for natural head and body posture analysis, J Craniomandib Pract, 13, 247
  8. 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70167-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1597/1545-1569(1998)035<0009:PEOAET>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70185-4 · DOI
  12. Ferrario VF, 1999, Morphometry of the normal human ear: a cross‐sectional study from adolescence to mid‐adulthood, J Craniofac Genet Develop Biol, 19, 226
  13. 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70084-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70220-9 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630415.x · DOI
  16. 10.1053/joms.2001.21872 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00006534-200108000-00001 · DOI
  18. Ferrario VF, 2001, Harmonic analysis of facial profiles: a 10‐year evaluation, Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 16, 54
  19. Ferrario VF, 2002, Three‐dimensional hard tissue palatal size and shape: a 10‐year longitudinal evaluation in healthy adults, Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 17, 51
  20. Foley TF, 1997, Soft tissue profile changes in late adolescent males, Angle Orthod, 67, 373
  21. 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70094-Q · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70007-9 · DOI
  23. Genecov JS, 1990, Development of the nose and soft tissue profile, Angle Orthod, 60, 191
  24. Gualdi‐Russo E, 1998, Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population, Homo, 49, 241
  25. 10.1093/ejo/23.3.275 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90098-1 · DOI
  27. Nanda RS, 1990, Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile, Angle Orthod, 60, 177
  28. 10.1097/00006534-199909040-00006 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ajpa.1330500107 · DOI
  30. 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00033 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70114-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1597/1545-1569(1994)031<0116:TDEOFA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  33. Ras F, 1995, Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry, Angle Orthod, 65, 233
  34. Silveira AM, 1992, Facial growth during adolescence in early, average and late maturers, Angle Orthod, 62, 185
  35. 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70073-W · DOI
  36. Ursi WJS, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth, Angle Orthod, 63, 47
  37. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000306)91:1<8::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Ciusa, V., & Dellavia, C.
Venue
Clinical Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-31
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
420-433
ISSN
  • 0897-3806
  • 1098-2353
Cited by
107
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review